H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Byron Black H2H: 5-2

Tim Henman holds a 5–2 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2000 Rome Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Byron Black
ZIM Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #10 7-6(5) 6-4 Byron Black #66 Match data
Mar 10, 2000* Scottsdale ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #11 6-1 6-4 Byron Black #64 Match data
Jun 11, 1999* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Tim Henman #6 6-1 6-4 Byron Black #37 Match data
Aug 1, 1998* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #12 5-7 6-1 6-4 Byron Black #31 Match data
Jun 28, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tim Henman #18 6-4 6-4 3-6 7-5 Byron Black #34 Match data
Nov 7, 1996* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Byron Black #49 6-2 3-6 6-4 Tim Henman #28 Match data
Apr 27, 1996* Seoul ATP 250 SF Hard Byron Black #28 6-2 6-4 Tim Henman #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Byron Black #876 #22 1,283 1,870 239 229 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Byron Black
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1991 2–3 40.0% #123 1,521 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1992 10–18 35.7% #142 1,544 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1993 19–20 48.7% #84 1,662 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1994 22–26 45.8% #66 1,732 0 0
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1995 28–24 53.8% #40 1,832 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1996 34–26 56.7% #44 1,747 0 1
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 1997 27–24 52.9% #76 1,724 0 1
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 1998 37–25 59.7% #28 1,738 0 1
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 1999 24–23 51.1% #65 1,690 0 2
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2000 27–24 52.9% #35 1,697 0 2
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2001 8–13 38.1% #196 1,647 0 2
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2002 1–3 25.0% #317 1,634 0 2