H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 4-1

Tim Henman holds a 4–1 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Stuttgart Masters third round 6-3 6-1.

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 28, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Daniel Vacek #54 6-3 6-1 Tim Henman #10 Match data
May 12, 1999* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #8 7-5 6-3 Daniel Vacek #65 Match data
Aug 9, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tim Henman #12 6-3 5-7 6-1 Daniel Vacek #66 Match data
Sep 25, 1997* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #20 6-4 1-6 6-3 Daniel Vacek #65 Match data
Aug 14, 1997* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #21 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Daniel Vacek #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,818 170 219 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Daniel Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,560 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,711 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,794 0 0
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1996 22–28 44.0% #71 1,694 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,672 0 0
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,744 0 0
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,630 0 0
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,578 0 0
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11