H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Henman vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 3-0
Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Queen's Club third round 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2003* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Tim Henman | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1999* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1998* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tim Henman | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |