H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 3-0

Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Queen's Club Championships round of 32 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Davide Sanguinetti
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #26 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) Davide Sanguinetti #89 Match data Jun 12, 2003* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Tim Henman #7 1-6 6-4 6-3 Davide Sanguinetti #50 Match data Feb 18, 1999* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Tim Henman #10 4-6 6-3 6-3 Davide Sanguinetti #52 Match data Aug 21, 1998* R16 New Haven ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,772 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,638 0 0
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,530 0 0
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,621 0 2
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,591 0 2
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,709 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Davide Sanguinetti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1994 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 17 16 33 51.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1999 2 5 7 28.6% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2001 5 13 18 27.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 15 10 25 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 78 100 178 43.8% 45 83 128 35.2% 20 27 47 42.6% 14 23 37 37.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 355/390 of Davide Sanguinetti's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1994 2/2 5.0 4.0 40.8% 71.3% 40.4% 63.5% 27.5% 52.8% 41.3%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1995 3/3 5.3 1.7 59.9% 74.9% 43.9% 41.3% 5.6% 62.5% 28.3%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1997 14/16 5.7 2.4 52.5% 68.6% 45.1% 59.9% 43.6% 57.4% 40.5%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1998 45/56 5.8 2.8 54.2% 72.2% 46.6% 55.4% 42.9% 60.0% 39.8%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1999 26/31 4.2 2.5 53.3% 66.6% 46.0% 55.1% 42.2% 56.9% 36.9%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2000 32/38 7.4 2.7 53.2% 73.9% 47.0% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 38.8%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2001 34/37 6.0 3.5 56.1% 69.8% 46.0% 53.6% 39.3% 59.2% 35.5%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2002 36/43 6.4 2.6 57.2% 68.2% 48.3% 53.9% 47.0% 59.7% 37.3%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 2003 36/37 4.5 2.4 58.7% 69.4% 48.3% 59.5% 39.6% 60.5% 36.2%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 2004 31/31 4.1 2.5 59.6% 66.5% 49.2% 52.1% 37.9% 59.5% 36.1%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 2005 50/50 5.4 1.6 57.2% 70.8% 49.8% 55.9% 39.5% 61.9% 37.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 33/33 4.9 2.2 57.1% 68.7% 49.6% 54.9% 31.7% 60.6% 34.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 13/13 5.3 2.2 59.4% 67.1% 44.4% 58.0% 39.6% 58.0% 35.1%
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 355/390 5.5 2.5 56.2% 69.7% 47.6% 55.6% 40.1% 59.9% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Davide Sanguinetti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 1994 1483 107.3 -0.36 +1.47 0.876 46.8% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.11
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1995 1455 106.3 -0.79 -2.82 0.755 45.0% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.04
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 1997 1498 126.0 -1.52 +0.15 0.950 48.9% — +63 — 42.5% -0.65 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.38
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 1998 1676 129.3 -1.67 +1.12 0.996 49.8% -85 -33 +42 51.4% +0.12 7–10 (41%) 8–11 (42%) — +3.09
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 1999 1560 123.1 -3.03 -1.02 0.856 47.3% +21 +5 — 36.1% -0.95 2–10 (17%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.62
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2000 1639 131.0 -0.65 +1.27 0.998 49.8% +4 -99 +25 45.2% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.27
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2001 1530 122.7 -2.53 -2.07 0.871 47.6% -6 -17 +99 34.0% -0.91 5–9 (36%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.78
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2002 1621 139.4 -1.91 +0.49 0.924 48.7% +54 -99 -32 50.0% -0.05 12–7 (63%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.85
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 2003 1621 125.3 -1.40 -0.39 0.915 48.5% +60 -134 -67 42.2% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.67
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 2004 1591 122.1 -2.81 -0.69 0.891 48.0% +49 -138 -34 41.3% -0.75 4–8 (33%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.44
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 2005 1710 134.9 -0.38 -0.85 0.974 49.5% -28 -90 -81 48.5% -0.04 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) — +0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1548 123.8 -1.74 -1.80 0.880 47.7% +25 +2 +57 34.5% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1520 110.9 -3.01 -0.31 0.835 46.7% +46 — — 42.9% -0.43 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.09
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1510 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1493 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1773 132.7 -1.71 -0.37 0.924 48.5% +16 -39 +4 43.2% -0.42 63–75 (46%) 72–95 (43%) 97.4 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.