H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 0-1

Jacco Eltingh holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1995 Brisbane International round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jacco Eltingh
NED Age 56 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jacco Eltingh #28 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #142 Match data Oct 5, 1995* R32 Brisbane International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Jacco Eltingh #1,378 #19 1,332 1,876 124 141 46.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Jacco Eltingh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #276 1,490 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% #128 1,525 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 1991 12–24 33.3% #114 1,510 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 1992 18–22 45.0% #78 1,591 0 1
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1993 22–26 45.8% #63 1,634 0 2
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1994 40–23 63.5% #23 1,829 0 4
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 1995 24–26 48.0% #43 1,772 0 4
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 1996 4–12 25.0% #307 1,617 0 4
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 1997 1–5 16.7% #604 1,557 0 4
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Jacco Eltingh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 4 12 16 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1993 10 13 23 43.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 37 59 96 38.5% 34 36 70 48.6% 26 19 45 57.8% 27 27 54 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 221/259 of Jacco Eltingh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Jacco Eltingh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 1991 33/36 7.1 3.6 60.0% 67.4% 46.4% 49.1% 34.5% 59.1% 31.9%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 1992 37/40 6.7 2.6 62.9% 72.4% 50.1% 68.9% 36.1% 64.2% 34.0%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 1993 43/48 6.0 3.5 63.0% 72.6% 48.7% 58.3% 35.2% 63.5% 33.4%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1994 49/63 9.5 4.0 63.3% 76.3% 48.7% 61.2% 35.3% 66.1% 34.2%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 1995 43/50 8.1 5.0 61.2% 74.7% 49.8% 61.9% 42.9% 65.0% 34.0%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 1996 11/16 6.4 4.3 56.0% 74.8% 47.9% 50.6% 38.3% 63.0% 32.2%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% 1997 5/6 11.4 5.4 61.5% 74.9% 50.4% 56.3% 40.6% 65.6% 32.1%
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 221/265 7.6 3.8 61.9% 73.2% 48.8% 59.6% 37.0% 63.9% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Jacco Eltingh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1490 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 1990 1525 104.0 — — — — +51 — — 61.5% +0.85 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.66
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.9 -0.04 1991 1510 114.5 -1.53 -5.09 0.781 45.9% -36 +33 +133 35.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 7–5 (58%) 102.4 +1.29
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) 102.6 -0.81 1992 1591 132.8 +2.27 -3.70 0.949 49.5% -101 +22 +152 44.1% -0.41 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 105.3 -1.05
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) 105.8 +0.85 1993 1635 126.1 +1.74 -3.99 0.916 48.5% -80 +16 +85 44.6% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 10–7 (59%) 106.8 -0.27
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) 104.5 -1.62 1994 1829 139.4 +3.57 -2.91 1.009 50.3% -35 -80 -105 60.4% +0.25 11–9 (55%) 33–10 (77%) 113.1 +2.23
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) 95.6 +0.72 1995 1772 145.8 +3.15 -2.97 0.973 50.2% -44 -33 +79 50.7% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 14–10 (58%) 102.1 -1.27
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) 100.3 +0.25 1996 1618 118.1 +0.37 -3.11 0.871 47.9% +14 — +178 32.5% -1.05 1–4 (20%) 5–5 (50%) 94.7 -0.29
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 96.3 +2.30 1997 1557 105.0 +1.00 -1.87 0.932 48.8% +19 — — 31.3% -0.50 0–2 1–5 (17%) — +0.30
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 94.1 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) 104.5 -2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) 95.8 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 91.8 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -17 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) 95.7 -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) 84.9 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1876 135.5 +1.94 -3.58 0.927 49.0% -45 -14 +74 47.3% -0.28 37–40 (48%) 81–56 (59%) 108.3 +0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.