H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tim Henman vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-1

Tim Henman holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1998 Stuttgart Masters third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman

GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H

2 – 1

3 main draw meetings

Mark Woodforde

AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Oct 29, 1998*	Stuttgart Masters	Masters 1000	R32	Hard	Tim Henman #9	7-5 6-1	Mark Woodforde #61	Match data
Jan 15, 1998*	Sydney Outdoor	ATP 250	R32	Hard	Tim Henman #19	6-2 3-6 6-4	Mark Woodforde #45	Match data
Jan 12, 1996*	Sydney Outdoor	ATP 250	R16	Hard	Mark Woodforde #63	3-6 6-3 6-3	Tim Henman #95	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Tim Henman	#615	#4	2,826	2,027	468	260	64.3%	0	1	0	0	10	11
Mark Woodforde	#985	#19	1,291	1,922	313	294	51.6%	0	0	0	0	4	4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Tim Henman							Mark Woodforde
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
19	1994	3–5	37.5%	#167	1,513	0	0	1985	6–4	60.0%	#127	1,578	0	0
20	1995	7–7	50.0%	#95	1,584	0	0	1986	11–14	44.0%	#181	1,546	0	1
21	1996	37–24	60.7%	#29	1,821	0	0	1987	12–13	48.0%	#67	1,648	0	1
22	1997	47–23	67.1%	#17	1,895	0	2	1988	31–23	57.4%	#42	1,800	0	2
23	1998	55–29	65.5%	#7	1,960	0	4	1989	20–15	57.1%	#75	1,710	0	3
24	1999	41–25	62.1%	#12	1,785	0	4	1990	12–12	50.0%	#101	1,716	0	3
25	2000	55–23	70.5%	#10	1,953	0	6	1991	12–21	36.4%	#88	1,631	0	3
26	2001	49–20	71.0%	#9	1,924	0	8	1992	27–23	54.0%	#40	1,814	0	3
27	2002	45–18	71.4%	#8	1,867	0	9	1993	28–20	58.3%	#28	1,792	0	4
28	2003	30–16	65.2%	#15	1,970	0	11	1994	29–23	55.8%	#43	1,792	0	4
29	2004	41–20	67.2%	#6	1,926	0	11	1995	31–25	55.4%	#51	1,760	0	4
30	2005	23–18	56.1%	#36	1,746	0	11	1996	32–25	56.1%	#27	1,800	0	4
31	2006	31–20	60.8%	#39	1,868	0	11	1997	24–26	48.0%	#46	1,731	0	4
32	2007	4–12	25.0%	#292	1,684	0	11	1998	25–24	51.0%	#58	1,747	0	4
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	10–19	34.5%	#130	1,611	0	4
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2000	3–7	30.0%	#321	1,584	0	4