H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tim van Rijthoven vs Emilio Gomez

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tim van Rijthoven vs Emilio Gomez.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim van Rijthoven
NED Age 29 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Emilio Gomez
ECU Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim van Rijthoven #202 6-4 6-2 Emilio Gomez #149 Match data May 22, 2022* Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim van Rijthoven #871 #101 546 1,759 10 10 50.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Emilio Gomez #1,508 #90 603 1,630 7 19 26.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim van Rijthoven Emilio Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2016 0–1 0.0% #381 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — 2013 1–1 50.0% #307 1,556 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #294 1,560 0 0
25 2022 9–6 60.0% #111 1,723 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #508 1,546 0 0
26 2023 1–2 33.3% #874 1,681 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2024 0–1 0.0% #871 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — 2020 0–3 0.0% #160 1,542 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2021 2–3 40.0% #148 1,589 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #104 1,547 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2023 4–6 40.0% #294 1,519 0 0

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim van Rijthoven Emilio Gomez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2016 1/1 11.0 4.0 55.6% 76.4% 40.9% 72.7% 25.0% 60.6% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/2 2.5 2.5 64.7% 68.5% 48.9% 74.4% 33.3% 62.1% 39.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 8.0 4.0 59.7% 77.9% 44.2% 75.0% 25.0% 64.3% 27.8%
25 2022 15/15 14.1 3.9 63.3% 78.2% 55.7% 56.6% 48.9% 69.7% 30.6% 2017 1/1 2.0 6.0 59.8% 70.1% 40.0% 37.5% 44.4% 58.0% 35.7%
26 2023 3/3 12.3 3.0 63.2% 81.9% 60.7% 73.6% 38.9% 73.9% 29.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2024 1/1 4.0 3.0 63.6% 57.1% 50.0% 20.0% 50.0% 54.5% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/3 3.0 1.3 61.5% 63.1% 42.6% 42.5% 77.8% 54.9% 31.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 3.0 2.0 59.2% 68.5% 45.5% 67.3% 39.3% 59.0% 36.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 2.3 2.8 58.7% 62.3% 48.4% 39.3% 32.3% 56.4% 31.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.7 3.1 59.2% 68.8% 39.2% 54.6% 44.5% 57.3% 33.1%
Career — 20/20 13.2 3.8 62.9% 77.6% 55.4% 58.1% 46.3% 69.1% 30.7% — 26/26 3.3 2.7 59.8% 67.5% 43.2% 54.9% 43.9% 57.9% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim van Rijthoven Emilio Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2016 1496 102.9 -1.21 +1.98 0.857 48.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2018 1509 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1556 113.8 -0.65 +2.19 1.032 50.3% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.17
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1557 103.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1547 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2021 1502 104.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1560 108.4 -0.73 -0.86 0.779 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
25 2022 1723 123.9 +4.04 -2.17 1.010 50.2% -148 — +87 57.8% +0.15 3–2 (60%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.20 2017 1547 102.8 -0.15 -5.58 0.851 47.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
26 2023 1681 111.2 0.00 -1.50 1.127 50.7% -127 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2024 1618 93.6 -0.77 -0.22 0.704 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00 2019 1531 103.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2025 1579 93.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1542 107.8 -2.03 -1.06 0.687 43.8% — — — 22.2% -2.22 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.49
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1590 117.3 -2.27 -0.06 0.896 48.4% +53 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 — — +0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1547 106.7 -1.90 -2.55 0.726 44.2% +54 — — 18.2% -2.46 0–2 1–0 — -0.01
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1520 113.9 -3.16 -0.57 0.775 45.4% +48 -38 — 34.8% -1.48 3–0 (100%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.09
Career — 1760 116.1 +2.93 -1.76 0.993 49.9% -140 — +87 52.6% -0.07 3–4 (43%) 11–9 (55%) 101.7 -0.50 — 1631 115.8 -2.26 -0.82 0.800 46.2% +51 -38 — 32.8% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 99.9 +2.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.