H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Jaroslav Navratil H2H: 1-1
Tim Wilkison and Jaroslav Navratil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1985 Nancy third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 68
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1985* | Nancy | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Wilkison | 6-3 6-4 | Jaroslav Navratil | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1984* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaroslav Navratil | 7-6 6-1 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jaroslav Navratil | #951 | #64 | 16 | 1,647 | 31 | 60 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Jaroslav Navratil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #302 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #169 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #87 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #181 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 1–13 | 7.1% | #431 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #571 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |