H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Jurgen Fassbender H2H: 0-1
Jurgen Fassbender holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jurgen Fassbender leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jurgen Fassbender won the 1979 Taipei fourth round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1979* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jurgen Fassbender | 7-6 7-5 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Jurgen Fassbender | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |