H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Karl Meiler H2H: 0-1
Karl Meiler holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karl Meiler leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karl Meiler won the 1977 Hong Kong third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1977* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Karl Meiler | 7-6 6-3 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Karl Meiler | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,894 | 252 | 189 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Karl Meiler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 15–5 | 75.0% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 47–28 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #67 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #31 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #54 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #270 | 1,554 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |