H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Peter Doohan H2H: 1-1
Tim Wilkison and Peter Doohan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on grass, while Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Doohan won the 1988 Bristol third round 6-3 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1988* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Peter Doohan | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1985* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Wilkison | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |