H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Peter Fleming H2H: 1-2
Peter Fleming holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Peter Fleming leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1985 Memphis second round 7-5 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1985* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Tim Wilkison | 7-5 6-7 6-3 | Peter Fleming | Match data |
| Sep 20, 1979* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Peter Fleming | 6-4 6-4 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1979* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Peter Fleming | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Peter Fleming | #933 | #8 | 0 | 2,046 | 224 | 214 | 51.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Peter Fleming | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #120 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #116 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 43–31 | 58.1% | #26 | 1,953 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #13 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #99 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #32 | 1,765 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #174 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |