H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 1-2
Robert Vant Hof holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Robert Vant Hof leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robert Vant Hof won the 1981 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-3 1-6 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1981* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Robert Vant Hof | 6-3 6-3 1-6 4-6 6-3 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tim Wilkison | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Robert Vant Hof | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1981* | Tampa | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robert Vant Hof | 6-2 7-5 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Robert Vant Hof | — | — | — | 1,878 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tim Wilkison | Robert Vant Hof | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |