H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Roberto Arguello H2H: 2-0
Tim Wilkison holds a 2–0 lead over Roberto Arguello in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Wilkison leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1986 Forest Hills second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1986* | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Tim Wilkison | 6-2 6-1 | Roberto Arguello | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1984* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tim Wilkison | 7-5 6-0 | Roberto Arguello | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Roberto Arguello | #829 | #38 | 144 | 1,718 | 60 | 82 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Roberto Arguello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #50 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #231 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #177 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #177 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #190 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #217 | 1,465 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |