H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Wilkison vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 0-3
Roscoe Tanner holds a 3–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1981 Memphis fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1981* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Roscoe Tanner | 6-2 6-3 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1980* | Manchester | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Roscoe Tanner | 7-6 6-4 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1979* | New Orleans | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Roscoe Tanner | 6-4 6-3 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Wilkison | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |