H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Blaz Kavcic H2H: 2-2
Tobias Kamke and Blaz Kavcic are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Blaz Kavcic leads 2–0 on clay, while Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2013 Miami Masters first round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tobias Kamke | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tobias Kamke | 6-3 7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 | Blaz Kavcic | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2011* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Blaz Kavcic | 7-6(0) 6-1 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2011* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Blaz Kavcic | 6-2 6-3 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blaz Kavcic | #1,195 | #68 | 685 | 1,810 | 40 | 79 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Blaz Kavcic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #285 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #112 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #92 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #94 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #105 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #151 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #206 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |