Tobias Kamke
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 16, 2014 | H2H |
| Ivan Dodig | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 21, 2014 | H2H |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 14, 2013 | H2H |
| Blaz Kavcic | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 22, 2013 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 12, 2015 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Eduardo Schwank H2H: 0-1
Eduardo Schwank holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eduardo Schwank leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eduardo Schwank won the 2010 Hamburg Open first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Schwank | 6-3 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data | Jul 21, 2010* | R64 | Hamburg Open | ATP 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,766 | 62 | 101 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eduardo Schwank | #1,858 | #48 | 1,380 | 1,741 | 37 | 61 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #118 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #97 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2008 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2010 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2010 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2011 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2011 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 35 | 61 | 96 | 36.5% | 16 | 27 | 43 | 37.2% | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | — | 8 | 20 | 28 | 28.6% | 28 | 34 | 62 | 45.2% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 2007 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 47.2% | 56.0% | 35.7% | 16.7% | — | 45.3% | 17.6% | 2007 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 64.8% | 42.9% | 47.4% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 44.4% | 32.6% |
| 22 | 2008 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 58.3% | 64.9% | 45.3% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 56.7% | 30.1% | 2008 | 30/30 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 63.6% | 70.4% | 51.7% | 68.0% | 43.3% | 63.6% | 36.2% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17/17 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 57.7% | 61.2% | 46.1% | 45.4% | 33.9% | 54.3% | 33.6% |
| 24 | 2010 | 15/15 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 59.0% | 65.8% | 48.0% | 56.5% | 35.6% | 58.8% | 39.1% | 2010 | 33/33 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 61.7% | 68.2% | 49.9% | 45.0% | 36.8% | 61.3% | 34.9% |
| 25 | 2011 | 38/38 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 57.2% | 65.9% | 50.9% | 55.5% | 39.3% | 59.5% | 38.5% | 2011 | 9/9 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 63.4% | 67.0% | 58.0% | 50.9% | 45.9% | 63.8% | 32.5% |
| 26 | 2012 | 24/24 | 1.4 | 4.6 | 57.4% | 61.6% | 45.8% | 47.2% | 39.2% | 54.8% | 40.4% | 2012 | 8/8 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 67.5% | 68.0% | 56.5% | 52.6% | 46.9% | 64.2% | 37.9% |
| 27 | 2013 | 38/38 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 60.4% | 66.9% | 49.5% | 60.7% | 46.9% | 60.0% | 39.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 25/25 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 61.0% | 66.2% | 51.7% | 60.8% | 36.4% | 60.4% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 6/6 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 56.5% | 61.9% | 46.0% | 38.6% | 45.4% | 54.5% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 61.2% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 45.7% | 44.5% | 58.8% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 57.0% | 73.4% | 51.3% | 60.9% | 58.5% | 64.2% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 46.4% | 66.7% | 44.1% | 60.0% | 33.3% | 54.5% | 29.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 163/163 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 58.8% | 65.4% | 49.3% | 54.9% | 41.0% | 58.7% | 38.2% | — | 98/98 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 62.3% | 67.3% | 51.0% | 53.3% | 40.6% | 61.1% | 35.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | 2007 | 1502 | 102.7 | +1.52 | -1.81 | 0.323 | 34.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 2007 | 1530 | 102.1 | -1.83 | -1.86 | 0.586 | 39.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.14 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1509 | 105.8 | +1.11 | -1.95 | 0.695 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 2008 | 1705 | 135.0 | +0.30 | -0.16 | 0.996 | 50.1% | -118 | +77 | -155 | 47.4% | +0.13 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–10 (33%) | 101.4 | -0.42 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1457 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1574 | 112.7 | -5.72 | -2.82 | 0.735 | 44.5% | -9 | +102 | -73 | 23.3% | -1.95 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 100.2 | +0.84 |
| 24 | 2010 | 1639 | 126.8 | -1.68 | +1.56 | 0.949 | 48.8% | -130 | -61 | +94 | 46.3% | -0.29 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.29 | 2010 | 1594 | 132.3 | -1.26 | -1.90 | 0.901 | 47.8% | -53 | +122 | — | 39.7% | -1.00 | 1–5 (17%) | 9–3 (75%) | 101.5 | +0.43 |
| 25 | 2011 | 1738 | 134.7 | -2.56 | +1.09 | 0.951 | 49.1% | -78 | -127 | +18 | 42.4% | -0.27 | 1–8 (11%) | 3–9 (25%) | 89.6 | +0.04 | 2011 | 1588 | 117.4 | +0.98 | -2.80 | 0.898 | 48.4% | -54 | +100 | — | 35.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 3–4 (43%) | — | -0.03 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1629 | 130.3 | -5.44 | +2.38 | 0.893 | 47.6% | -3 | -69 | — | 33.9% | -1.11 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–4 (20%) | 91.7 | -0.37 | 2012 | 1673 | 119.1 | +0.19 | +1.41 | 1.060 | 50.5% | — | +49 | — | 50.0% | +0.05 | 1–1 | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.39 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1731 | 143.6 | -2.58 | +2.05 | 0.978 | 50.0% | +2 | -95 | -37 | 48.9% | +0.08 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.2 | -0.29 | 2013 | 1625 | 92.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 1669 | 132.2 | -3.08 | -1.17 | 0.873 | 48.0% | -24 | -5 | +60 | 42.6% | -0.69 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–5 (55%) | 99.9 | +0.69 | 2014 | 1591 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1583 | 117.3 | -3.20 | +0.43 | 0.825 | 46.0% | -7 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.69 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 1707 | 126.4 | -2.95 | +1.32 | 0.953 | 49.2% | -8 | — | — | 47.8% | -0.17 | 1–0 | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 1618 | 113.4 | +0.68 | +0.45 | 1.108 | 51.9% | — | — | +97 | 55.6% | +0.33 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 1543 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1567 | 110.3 | -0.77 | -0.97 | 0.651 | 42.8% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 1532 | 92.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1492 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 1515 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1766 | 131.0 | -2.90 | +1.13 | 0.926 | 48.7% | -32 | -76 | +38 | 42.4% | -0.48 | 12–30 (29%) | 21–28 (43%) | 91.3 | +0.26 | — | 1741 | 127.6 | -1.24 | -1.34 | 0.901 | 48.1% | -68 | +95 | -114 | 39.5% | -0.69 | 10–17 (37%) | 25–21 (54%) | 101.4 | +0.58 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Eduardo Schwank
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 23, 2011 | H2H |
| Igor Andreev | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 17, 2011 | H2H |
| Nicolas Almagro | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 27, 2010 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 26, 2012 | H2H |
| Lukasz Kubot | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 24, 2011 | H2H |