H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tobias Kamke vs Go Soeda H2H: 0-1

Go Soeda holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Go Soeda leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Go Soeda won the 2011 Bangkok round of 16 6-2 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Go Soeda
JPN Age 41 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Go Soeda #126 6-2 7-6(7) Tobias Kamke #103 Match data Sep 30, 2011* R16 Bangkok ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Go Soeda #683 #47 888 1,709 29 78 27.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tobias Kamke Go Soeda
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #302 1,484 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,462 0 0
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #206 1,488 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2008 1–3 25.0% #114 1,478 0 0
24 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0 2009 0–3 0.0% #238 1,498 0 0
25 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #120 1,474 0 0
26 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0 2011 3–7 30.0% #120 1,566 0 0
27 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0 2012 10–17 37.0% #60 1,631 0 0
28 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0 2013 6–15 28.6% #103 1,701 0 0
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0 2014 1–3 25.0% #99 1,581 0 0
30 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0 2015 6–12 33.3% #132 1,653 0 0
31 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0 2016 0–1 0.0% #126 1,644 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 0–3 0.0% #150 1,603 0 0
33 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — 2019 1–1 50.0% #121 1,594 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #133 1,585 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tobias Kamke Go Soeda
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 5 12 17 29.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — 24 58 82 29.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's and 106/107 of Go Soeda's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tobias Kamke Go Soeda
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 5.0 4.0 57.5% 63.4% 54.6% 47.2% 71.4% 59.6% 29.6%
21 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6% 2006 2/2 1.5 3.5 51.2% 59.3% 43.3% 51.4% 50.0% 50.9% 27.5%
22 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1% 2007 3/3 2.3 2.3 58.2% 66.5% 47.4% 45.5% 27.8% 58.6% 27.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 4/4 2.5 1.8 59.6% 70.7% 42.3% 54.2% 35.8% 59.5% 35.3%
24 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1% 2009 3/3 1.3 4.3 58.7% 62.1% 39.3% 48.4% 71.4% 52.5% 29.3%
25 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5% 2010 5/5 3.2 3.4 52.7% 66.1% 48.6% 62.2% 20.2% 57.8% 34.4%
26 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4% 2011 10/10 2.5 3.3 51.9% 61.1% 48.1% 53.8% 24.1% 54.6% 31.3%
27 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2% 2012 26/27 3.1 2.7 52.6% 67.5% 49.8% 46.3% 43.3% 59.1% 37.9%
28 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6% 2013 21/21 3.8 2.9 56.6% 68.8% 46.3% 48.9% 42.5% 59.2% 32.3%
29 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5% 2014 4/4 2.3 2.5 60.1% 65.9% 38.4% 49.5% 33.3% 54.8% 41.9%
30 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3% 2015 18/18 2.3 2.1 57.2% 68.7% 47.8% 53.8% 25.3% 59.9% 32.6%
31 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7% 2016 1/1 4.0 1.0 63.2% 73.3% 48.6% 55.6% 16.7% 64.2% 30.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 3/3 2.7 1.0 56.6% 63.5% 48.8% 41.3% 55.0% 56.9% 28.5%
33 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 5.0 2.5 54.0% 72.6% 48.7% 70.8% 37.5% 61.4% 27.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 3.5 3.0 60.6% 62.2% 58.5% 47.8% 12.5% 60.8% 22.7%
Career — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2% — 106/107 3.0 2.7 55.5% 66.9% 47.5% 50.6% 36.9% 58.3% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tobias Kamke Go Soeda
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1485 101.8 -0.40 -1.85 0.733 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–0 — -0.24
21 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07 2006 1463 107.8 -1.06 +0.75 0.560 39.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.25
22 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07 2007 1488 103.9 -0.94 -1.36 0.668 44.0% +11 — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 — — -0.32
23 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1478 108.0 -1.73 +0.50 0.872 48.4% +13 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.03
24 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 2009 1499 109.9 -3.20 -0.53 0.617 42.3% +9 — — 14.3% -2.29 0–1 — — +0.01
25 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04 2010 1474 106.1 -1.99 -0.82 0.815 46.4% — — +51 16.7% -2.08 1–0 0–1 — +0.18
26 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37 2011 1567 116.3 -3.91 -2.57 0.689 43.7% 0 — — 26.9% -2.08 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.8 +0.17
27 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29 2012 1631 134.7 -2.57 +0.96 0.928 48.5% +24 — -97 39.4% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 2–6 (25%) 97.4 -0.30
28 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69 2013 1701 130.6 -3.36 -2.47 0.791 46.1% +14 — — 30.9% -1.27 3–2 (60%) 4–7 (36%) 99.4 +0.77
29 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03 2014 1581 111.3 -0.66 +0.64 0.926 48.3% +29 — — 22.2% -1.44 — 0–1 — 0.00
30 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76 2015 1653 131.9 -2.99 -1.11 0.813 46.3% -4 -213 — 32.6% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 105.6 -0.52
31 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10 2016 1645 110.7 +1.28 +0.72 0.860 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
32 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1604 109.6 -1.95 -3.50 0.662 44.4% +17 — — 0.0% -2.14 — 0–2 — +0.31
33 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04 2018 1554 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1594 128.8 +2.61 +3.04 0.709 45.8% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.19
35 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1586 113.3 -0.77 +0.65 0.578 42.8% — — — 16.7% -2.34 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
36 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1510 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1452 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26 — 1709 124.4 -2.51 -0.78 0.803 46.3% +12 -213 -53 29.7% -1.30 13–16 (45%) 17–22 (44%) 99.8 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.