H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Go Soeda H2H: 0-1
Go Soeda holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Go Soeda leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Go Soeda won the 2011 Bangkok fourth round 6-2 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 41
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2011* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Go Soeda | 6-2 7-6(7) | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Go Soeda | #683 | #47 | 888 | 1,722 | 29 | 76 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Go Soeda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #120 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |