H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 0-1
Igor Sijsling holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Sijsling leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Sijsling won the 2013 Stockholm third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2015 | Sydney | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Igor Sijsling | 6-2 7-5 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2013* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Igor Sijsling | 6-4 6-2 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Igor Sijsling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |