Tobias Kamke
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 16, 2014 | H2H |
| Ivan Dodig | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 21, 2014 | H2H |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 14, 2013 | H2H |
| Blaz Kavcic | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 22, 2013 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 12, 2015 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Laurynas Grigelis
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tobias Kamke vs Laurynas Grigelis.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurynas Grigelis | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | Tobias Kamke | Match data | May 1, 2017 | Q1 | Istanbul | ATP 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,766 | 62 | 101 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laurynas Grigelis | #1,340 | #183 | 278 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Laurynas Grigelis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #97 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Laurynas Grigelis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1474 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1538 | 111.4 | -0.35 | -3.25 | 0.600 | 40.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.06 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1519 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 1502 | 102.7 | +1.52 | -1.81 | 0.323 | 34.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 1509 | 105.8 | +1.11 | -1.95 | 0.695 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 2014 | 1492 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 1457 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1485 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 1639 | 126.8 | -1.68 | +1.56 | 0.949 | 48.8% | -130 | -61 | +94 | 46.3% | -0.29 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 1738 | 134.7 | -2.56 | +1.09 | 0.951 | 49.1% | -78 | -127 | +18 | 42.4% | -0.27 | 1–8 (11%) | 3–9 (25%) | 89.6 | +0.04 | 2017 | 1481 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 1629 | 130.3 | -5.44 | +2.38 | 0.893 | 47.6% | -3 | -69 | — | 33.9% | -1.11 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–4 (20%) | 91.7 | -0.37 | 2018 | 1494 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 1731 | 143.6 | -2.58 | +2.05 | 0.978 | 50.0% | +2 | -95 | -37 | 48.9% | +0.08 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.2 | -0.29 | 2019 | 1497 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 1669 | 132.2 | -3.08 | -1.17 | 0.873 | 48.0% | -24 | -5 | +60 | 42.6% | -0.69 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–5 (55%) | 99.9 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1583 | 117.3 | -3.20 | +0.43 | 0.825 | 46.0% | -7 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.69 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 1707 | 126.4 | -2.95 | +1.32 | 0.953 | 49.2% | -8 | — | — | 47.8% | -0.17 | 1–0 | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 1618 | 113.4 | +0.68 | +0.45 | 1.108 | 51.9% | — | — | +97 | 55.6% | +0.33 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 1543 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1567 | 110.3 | -0.77 | -0.97 | 0.651 | 42.8% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 1532 | 92.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1492 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 1515 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1766 | 131.0 | -2.90 | +1.13 | 0.926 | 48.7% | -32 | -76 | +38 | 42.4% | -0.48 | 12–30 (29%) | 21–28 (43%) | 91.3 | +0.26 | — | 1555 | 102.8 | -0.35 | -3.25 | 0.600 | 40.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -6.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Laurynas Grigelis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Falla | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 28, 2011 | H2H |