H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-1
Tobias Kamke and Lukasz Kubot are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on grass, while Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2013 Halle third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2013* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Tobias Kamke | 6-4 6-0 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2011* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2009 | Doha | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tobias Kamke | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |