H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Tobias Kamke vs Stephane Robert H2H: 1-0
Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over Stephane Robert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2014 | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Stephane Robert | 6-4 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| May 26, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Tobias Kamke | 6-0 6-4 6-3 | Stephane Robert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephane Robert | #1,486 | #50 | 926 | 1,839 | 38 | 75 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tobias Kamke | Stephane Robert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #105 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #134 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #208 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #218 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #898 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |