H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 0-2

Amos Mansdorf holds a 2–0 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1994 Canadian Open round of 32 6-7(4) 6-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Amos Mansdorf
ISR Age 60 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amos Mansdorf #80 6-7(4) 6-3 (ret.) Todd Martin #8 Match data Jul 28, 1994* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Amos Mansdorf #29 7-6(3) 7-5 Todd Martin #24 Match data Jul 25, 1993* F Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Amos Mansdorf #514 #18 1,184 1,895 290 215 57.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Amos Mansdorf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 3–2 60.0% #270 1,531 0 0
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 1985 15–13 53.6% #84 1,672 0 0
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,800 0 1
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1987 35–21 62.5% #27 1,805 0 2
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1988 33–17 66.0% #26 1,835 0 4
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 1989 29–19 60.4% #39 1,739 0 4
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 1990 39–23 62.9% #33 1,828 0 5
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 1991 21–25 45.7% #62 1,740 0 5
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 1992 35–27 56.5% #25 1,772 0 5
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 1993 40–24 62.5% #25 1,780 0 6
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1994 20–25 44.4% #69 1,693 0 6
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Amos Mansdorf
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 13 8 21 61.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5%
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1988 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1989 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1990 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1991 17 13 30 56.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 6 6 0.0%
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1992 24 16 40 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 31 13 44 70.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 201 122 323 62.2% 9 26 35 25.7% 35 22 57 61.4% 45 45 90 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Amos Mansdorf
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1489 96.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.06
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1499 102.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1531 104.3 — — — — +32 — — 60.0% 0.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.76
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 1985 1672 131.3 — — — — -36 -131 -32 52.9% +0.47 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 100.0 +1.17
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12 1986 1800 142.4 — — — — -19 -254 -125 54.7% +0.53 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 95.3 -0.07
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21 1987 1805 142.3 — — — — +11 — -124 59.9% +0.89 10–9 (53%) 7–13 (35%) 93.4 +1.76
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69 1988 1836 146.9 — — — — +64 — -174 63.4% +0.67 9–6 (60%) 13–5 (72%) 105.2 -0.60
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38 1989 1740 140.4 — — — — +39 — -19 59.0% +0.75 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) 100.3 +0.68
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11 1990 1829 146.5 — — — — -3 -306 +23 58.9% +0.65 9–6 (60%) 15–9 (63%) 105.0 +0.66
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56 1991 1740 143.1 -0.65 +0.28 0.950 49.1% +19 -227 +79 46.1% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 5–13 (28%) 94.9 -3.32
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34 1992 1772 149.8 +2.43 +0.52 1.057 51.0% +35 -280 +32 54.5% +0.20 10–8 (56%) 15–9 (63%) 104.3 -0.40
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34 1993 1780 154.3 +3.76 +1.90 1.154 52.7% +32 — — 57.2% +0.79 11–7 (61%) 14–15 (48%) 102.7 -0.75
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18 1994 1694 129.3 -0.97 -0.68 0.957 49.3% +26 -226 +133 44.0% -0.35 6–5 (55%) 10–9 (53%) 100.6 +1.54
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1895 149.2 +1.53 +0.65 1.039 50.8% +23 -232 -23 55.6% +0.46 82–65 (56%) 97–94 (51%) 101.0 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.