H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Daniel Nestor H2H: 1-0
Todd Woodbridge holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Nestor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1996 Canada Masters fourth round 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1996* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | Daniel Nestor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Nestor | #1,106 | #58 | 752 | 1,737 | 69 | 101 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Daniel Nestor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #823 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #177 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #112 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #107 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #219 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #500 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1062 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |