H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Tom Edlefsen vs Andrew Pattison H2H: 1-0

Tom Edlefsen holds a 1–0 lead over Andrew Pattison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tom Edlefsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Edlefsen won the 1973 Lacosta Wct round of 16 7-5 2-6 6-2.

USA Age 84 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 77 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tom Edlefsen 7-5 2-6 6-2 Andrew Pattison Match data Jan 26, 1973* R16 Lacosta Wct ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tom Edlefsen #172 #94 0 1,740 109 144 43.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrew Pattison — — — 1,979 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tom Edlefsen Andrew Pattison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
26 1968 19–22 46.3% — 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1969 26–25 51.0% — 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1970 16–18 47.1% — 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1971 21–19 52.5% — 1,630 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1972 10–10 50.0% — 1,719 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1973 9–25 26.5% #111 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1974 6–16 27.3% #118 1,508 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1975 2–9 18.2% #172 1,511 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tom Edlefsen Andrew Pattison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 6 6 12 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 10 7 17 58.8% 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 14 4 18 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 0 2 100.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1968 6 8 14 42.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 8 6 14 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1969 7 7 14 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
28 1970 7 9 16 43.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 11 9 20 55.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
29 1971 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1972 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1979 13 7 20 65.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
31 1973 5 9 14 35.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8%
32 1974 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 45 56 101 44.6% 30 36 66 45.5% 16 18 34 47.1% 18 34 52 34.6% — 96 79 175 54.9% 63 60 123 51.2% 30 28 58 51.7% 67 70 137 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tom Edlefsen Andrew Pattison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1450 97.3 — — — — -2 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1473 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.07
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1495 118.9 — — — — +83 +22 -13 35.2% -0.83 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1586 125.5 — — — — +32 — -50 49.0% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.46
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1840 143.0 — — — — -75 -3 -227 62.3% +0.95 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 109.4 +0.20
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1772 131.9 — — — — -44 +3 -85 48.5% -0.10 8–7 (53%) 7–11 (39%) 100.0 -2.69
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1923 152.3 — — — — -14 -57 — 66.0% +1.30 8–3 (73%) 4–1 (80%) 109.2 -1.00
26 1968 1529 107.7 — — — — -11 -39 +57 47.6% -0.09 5–8 (38%) — — +1.19 1975 1934 141.1 — — — — -77 -16 -175 54.2% +0.23 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 99.9 -1.91
27 1969 1597 119.2 — — — — +6 -63 +29 50.0% +0.15 8–9 (47%) — — +1.81 1976 1821 146.5 — — — — +15 — — 42.5% -0.37 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 103.6 -2.93
28 1970 1595 114.7 — — — — +15 -21 — 48.1% +0.22 4–5 (44%) 0–2 — +3.58 1977 1774 143.3 — — — — +32 +17 -27 51.1% +0.14 10–9 (53%) 14–6 (70%) 105.5 -2.22
29 1971 1630 119.3 — — — — -4 0 — 51.6% +0.18 9–8 (53%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 +3.35 1978 1708 135.0 — — — — +19 +74 — 47.2% +0.19 4–3 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 101.7 +1.01
30 1972 1720 125.4 — — — — -27 — — 45.1% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 108.7 -1.17 1979 1777 133.3 — — — — +32 -64 -59 49.1% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 104.1 -0.12
31 1973 1571 118.2 — — — — -6 +60 — 30.4% -1.11 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 98.7 -1.00 1980 1732 146.9 — — — — +51 -26 +6 50.0% +0.07 4–3 (57%) 6–11 (35%) 97.6 -3.35
32 1974 1509 109.4 — — — — +36 +67 — 32.7% -1.49 2–3 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 101.9 +0.86 1981 1689 126.4 — — — — +45 -39 — 40.5% -0.60 4–2 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.5 +0.16
33 1975 1512 118.2 — — — — +16 — — 24.0% -1.88 1–2 (33%) — — -0.84 1982 1622 121.6 — — — — +11 — — 36.1% -1.17 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1603 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25
Career — 1740 120.0 — — — — +1 -14 +41 44.2% -0.32 43–45 (49%) 21–22 (49%) 103.1 +3.14 — 1979 145.1 — — — — +3 -7 -92 50.3% +0.11 78–59 (57%) 71–64 (53%) 108.6 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.