H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tom Leonard vs Robert Maud H2H: 1-2
Robert Maud holds a 2–1 lead over Tom Leonard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Robert Maud leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tom Leonard won the 1972 Stockholm second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 78
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1972* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tom Leonard | 6-3 6-4 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1972* | Macon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Robert Maud | 6-1 6-4 | Tom Leonard | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1971* | Berkeley | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robert Maud | 6-3 6-4 | Tom Leonard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Leonard | #398 | #34 | 0 | 1,755 | 59 | 130 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,804 | 123 | 131 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Leonard | Robert Maud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1971 | 4–15 | 21.1% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1972 | 4–25 | 13.8% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1973 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #117 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1974 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #105 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1977 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #124 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #178 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1978 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #167 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1981 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #178 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |