H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tom Okker vs Brian Fairlie H2H: 8-1

Tom Okker holds an 8–1 lead over Brian Fairlie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 3–1 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1973 Houston Wct quarterfinal 6-1 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tom Okker

NED Age 82 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H

8 – 1

9 main draw meetings

Brian Fairlie

NZL Age 78 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Tom Okker	6-1 4-6 7-6	Brian Fairlie	Match data	Apr 7, 1973*	QF	Houston Wct	ATP 250	Clay
Brian Fairlie	6-0 6-3	Tom Okker	Match data	Jan 23, 1973*	QF	London Wct	ATP 250	Hard
Tom Okker	7-6 6-3	Brian Fairlie	Match data	Aug 23, 1972*	R32	Fort Worth Wct	ATP 250	Hard
Tom Okker	7-5 6-1	Brian Fairlie	Match data	Aug 1, 1972*	R32	Louisville Wct	ATP 250	Clay
Tom Okker	6-2 6-3	Brian Fairlie	Match data	Oct 20, 1971*	R32	Cologne Wct	ATP 250	Carpet
Tom Okker	6-3 7-6	Brian Fairlie	Match data	Sep 30, 1971*	R32	Berkeley	ATP 250	Hard
Tom Okker	3-6 7-6 6-1	Brian Fairlie	Match data	Aug 11, 1971*	R32	U.S. Pro Tennis Championships	ATP 250	Hard
Tom Okker	UNK	Brian Fairlie	Match data	May 2, 1971*	R16	Chicago Wct	ATP 250	Carpet
Tom Okker	10-8 7-5	Brian Fairlie	Match data	May 23, 1969*	R64	Italian Open	ATP 250	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Tom Okker	#438	#3	0	2,196	668	278	70.6%	0	0	0	1	33	34
Brian Fairlie	#332	#24	0	1,903	233	220	51.4%	0	0	0	0	3	3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Tom Okker							Brian Fairlie
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1968	8–9	47.1%	—	1,530	0	0
21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	13–14	48.1%	—	1,619	0	0
22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1970	36–20	64.3%	—	1,814	0	0
23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1971	20–29	40.8%	—	1,667	0	0
24	1968	89–23	79.5%	—	1,793	0	4	1972	13–27	32.5%	—	1,721	0	1
25	1969	86–25	77.5%	—	2,029	0	12	1973	33–21	61.1%	#25	1,769	0	2
26	1970	59–27	68.6%	—	1,947	0	17	1974	11–12	47.8%	#58	1,790	0	2
27	1971	74–31	70.5%	—	2,012	0	19	1975	21–16	56.8%	#66	1,807	0	2
28	1972	69–31	69.0%	—	2,042	0	20	1976	41–29	58.6%	#36	1,831	0	3
29	1973	91–23	79.8%	#4	2,171	0	27	1977	26–25	51.0%	#86	1,665	0	3
30	1974	61–18	77.2%	#6	2,074	0	30	1978	9–13	40.9%	#123	1,649	0	3
31	1975	39–13	75.0%	#11	2,076	0	32	1979	2–5	28.6%	#332	1,607	0	3
32	1976	33–18	64.7%	#23	1,962	0	32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1977	15–13	53.6%	#29	1,935	0	33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1978	20–20	50.0%	#50	1,882	0	33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1979	20–18	52.6%	#56	1,774	0	34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1980	11–13	45.8%	#107	1,716	0	34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1981	1–5	16.7%	—	1,652	0	34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Tom Okker																	Brian Fairlie
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1968	2	1	3	66.7%	5	6	11	45.5%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—
21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	4	3	7	57.1%	4	5	9	44.4%	5	4	9	55.6%	0	2	2	0.0%
22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1970	5	5	10	50.0%	20	8	28	71.4%	9	5	14	64.3%	2	2	4	50.0%
23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1971	7	8	15	46.7%	4	8	12	33.3%	6	6	12	50.0%	3	7	10	30.0%
24	1968	26	9	35	74.3%	35	7	42	83.3%	20	2	22	90.9%	8	5	13	61.5%	1972	8	8	16	50.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	14	16	12.5%
25	1969	19	9	28	67.9%	36	6	42	85.7%	14	4	18	77.8%	17	6	23	73.9%	1973	5	0	5	100.0%	10	10	20	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	15	8	23	65.2%
26	1970	15	6	21	71.4%	16	3	19	84.2%	21	12	33	63.6%	7	6	13	53.8%	1974	5	5	10	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%
27	1971	12	7	19	63.2%	24	10	34	70.6%	13	4	17	76.5%	25	10	35	71.4%	1975	3	7	10	30.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	6	2	8	75.0%	8	4	12	66.7%
28	1972	22	10	32	68.8%	10	5	15	66.7%	2	1	3	66.7%	35	15	50	70.0%	1976	16	6	22	72.7%	19	16	35	54.3%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	4	6	33.3%
29	1973	16	5	21	76.2%	39	8	47	83.0%	4	2	6	66.7%	32	8	40	80.0%	1977	0	3	3	0.0%	14	10	24	58.3%	10	8	18	55.6%	2	4	6	33.3%
30	1974	14	5	19	73.7%	17	6	23	73.9%	6	2	8	75.0%	24	5	29	82.8%	1978	0	2	2	0.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	5	5	10	50.0%	3	1	4	75.0%
31	1975	13	3	16	81.3%	1	3	4	25.0%	10	1	11	90.9%	15	6	21	71.4%	1979	1	3	4	25.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1976	6	3	9	66.7%	7	5	12	58.3%	5	2	7	71.4%	15	8	23	65.2%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1977	4	4	8	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	8	7	15	53.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1978	3	4	7	42.9%	9	8	17	52.9%	6	2	8	75.0%	2	6	8	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1979	11	6	17	64.7%	3	5	8	37.5%	4	1	5	80.0%	2	6	8	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1980	5	4	9	55.6%	2	5	7	28.6%	2	1	3	66.7%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1981	1	3	4	25.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	167	78	245	68.2%	199	73	272	73.2%	110	36	146	75.3%	192	91	283	67.8%	—	56	51	107	52.3%	86	80	166	51.8%	51	40	91	56.0%	40	49	89	44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Tom Okker																Brian Fairlie
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1968	1531	109.4	—	—	—	—	+57	-40	—	53.2%	+0.57	2–1 (67%)	—	—	-0.19
21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	1619	120.9	—	—	—	—	-9	-103	+38	54.4%	+0.56	3–6 (33%)	—	—	-0.19
22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1970	1814	134.8	—	—	—	—	-161	-88	+23	64.2%	+1.14	7–8 (47%)	2–4 (33%)	—	+2.58
23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1971	1668	134.3	—	—	—	—	-55	-9	+121	47.5%	-0.13	4–8 (33%)	10–7 (59%)	—	-3.36
24	1968	1794	133.7	—	—	—	—	+101	+28	+106	72.8%	+1.68	13–8 (62%)	—	—	+1.39	1972	1722	140.7	—	—	—	—	-54	-40	—	37.6%	-0.58	5–7 (42%)	9–10 (47%)	—	-3.69
25	1969	2030	149.0	—	—	—	—	+67	+67	-72	73.5%	+1.60	14–8 (64%)	2–0	—	-4.53	1973	1770	145.7	—	—	—	—	+90	-80	-9	57.5%	+0.66	12–9 (57%)	4–10 (29%)	—	-1.88
26	1970	1947	145.1	—	—	—	—	-16	+206	+16	66.5%	+1.16	8–11 (42%)	7–4 (64%)	—	+2.19	1974	1791	136.9	—	—	—	—	+39	-92	—	54.0%	+0.24	3–5 (38%)	2–3 (40%)	—	-2.08
27	1971	2013	159.9	—	—	—	—	+69	+10	+75	65.3%	+1.09	15–11 (58%)	15–22 (41%)	—	-6.81	1975	1808	143.0	—	—	—	—	-2	-106	+39	56.0%	+0.38	6–6 (50%)	11–6 (65%)	—	-1.86
28	1972	2043	156.9	—	—	—	—	+57	-30	-5	63.5%	+1.01	22–10 (69%)	24–19 (56%)	—	-5.06	1976	1831	141.5	—	—	—	—	+35	-56	-24	54.4%	+0.29	9–5 (64%)	13–9 (59%)	—	+0.53
29	1973	2171	158.0	—	—	—	—	+40	-10	-158	70.9%	+1.31	23–7 (77%)	20–10 (67%)	—	-4.78	1977	1665	132.6	—	—	—	—	+59	+102	+40	51.6%	+0.21	6–7 (46%)	3–7 (30%)	—	+1.62
30	1974	2074	157.5	—	—	—	—	+132	+65	-20	68.6%	+0.99	20–3 (87%)	22–8 (73%)	—	-4.73	1978	1650	125.4	—	—	—	—	+61	+41	+69	44.6%	-0.70	2–3 (40%)	3–2 (60%)	—	+0.03
31	1975	2076	152.1	—	—	—	—	+76	-53	+48	70.1%	+1.53	9–4 (69%)	5–2 (71%)	—	-1.17	1979	1608	111.6	—	—	—	—	+51	+62	—	35.3%	-0.41	1–2 (33%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.35
32	1976	1963	149.2	—	—	—	—	+53	-21	+146	61.5%	+0.73	7–4 (64%)	5–4 (56%)	—	-1.71	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1977	1936	150.8	—	—	—	—	+16	—	+174	52.1%	+0.08	6–4 (60%)	2–1 (67%)	—	-2.95	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1978	1882	150.6	—	—	—	—	-30	-29	+247	51.9%	+0.15	7–7 (50%)	5–5 (50%)	—	-4.63	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1979	1774	131.3	—	—	—	—	+9	-16	+387	51.0%	+0.03	8–5 (62%)	8–8 (50%)	—	0.00	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1980	1717	136.0	—	—	—	—	+27	-8	+440	47.5%	-0.25	3–5 (38%)	5–2 (71%)	—	+0.78	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1981	1653	106.8	—	—	—	—	+39	—	—	26.7%	-1.20	0–1	0–3 (0%)	—	-0.28	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2196	154.7	—	—	—	—	+57	+28	+63	65.9%	+1.08	155–88 (64%)	120–88 (58%)	102.9	-3.45	—	1903	141.9	—	—	—	—	0	-37	+43	52.7%	+0.28	60–67 (47%)	58–60 (49%)	99.9	-1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Tom Okker's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Arthur Ashe	10	16	26	Nov 2, 1975	H2H
Rod Laver	3	22	25	May 18, 1974	H2H
Roger Taylor	17	8	25	Mar 24, 1973	H2H
Tony Roche	16	8	24	Feb 21, 1977	H2H
John Newcombe	11	11	22	May 13, 1974	H2H

Brian Fairlie's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Tom Gorman	5	5	10	Aug 12, 1976	H2H
Ray Ruffels	5	4	9	Jun 15, 1977	H2H
Tom Okker	1	8	9	Apr 7, 1973	H2H
Dick Crealy	4	4	8	Jul 13, 1978	H2H
Mark Cox	4	4	8	Mar 10, 1975	H2H