H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tom Okker vs Robert Maud H2H: 4-1

Tom Okker holds a 4–1 lead over Robert Maud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1972 Montreal Wct round of 32 2-6 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tom Okker
NED Age 82 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Robert Maud
RSA Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tom Okker 2-6 7-6 6-3 Robert Maud Match data Sep 20, 1972* R32 Montreal Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Tom Okker 6-3 6-2 Robert Maud Match data Jul 9, 1972* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Hard
Tom Okker 8-6 4-6 13-11 Robert Maud Match data Aug 7, 1970* QF Dutch Open ATP 250 Hard
Tom Okker 3-6 13-11 6-3 Robert Maud Match data Jul 23, 1970* R16 Leicester ATP 250 Grass
Robert Maud 9-7 6-2 6-4 Tom Okker Match data Jan 19, 1968* QF Durban 1 ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tom Okker #438 #3 0 2,196 668 278 70.6% 0 0 0 1 33 34
Robert Maud #326 #57 0 1,765 123 130 48.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tom Okker Robert Maud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1968 29–11 72.5% — 1,700 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1969 21–10 67.7% — 1,702 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1970 23–13 63.9% — 1,696 0 2
24 1968 89–23 79.5% — 1,793 0 4 1971 22–31 41.5% — 1,669 0 2
25 1969 86–25 77.5% — 2,029 0 12 1972 6–26 18.8% — 1,588 0 2
26 1970 59–27 68.6% — 1,947 0 17 1973 8–16 33.3% #73 1,586 0 2
27 1971 74–31 70.5% — 2,012 0 19 1974 12–13 48.0% #62 1,640 0 2
28 1972 69–31 69.0% — 2,042 0 20 1975 2–10 16.7% #178 1,604 0 2
29 1973 91–23 79.8% #4 2,171 0 27 — — — — — — —
30 1974 61–18 77.2% #6 2,074 0 30 — — — — — — —
31 1975 39–13 75.0% #11 2,076 0 32 — — — — — — —
32 1976 33–18 64.7% #23 1,962 0 32 — — — — — — —
33 1977 15–13 53.6% #29 1,935 0 33 — — — — — — —
34 1978 20–20 50.0% #50 1,882 0 33 — — — — — — —
35 1979 20–18 52.6% #56 1,774 0 34 — — — — — — —
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #107 1,716 0 34 — — — — — — —
37 1981 1–5 16.7% — 1,652 0 34 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tom Okker Robert Maud
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — —
24 1968 26 9 35 74.3% 35 7 42 83.3% 20 2 22 90.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 1971 6 11 17 35.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1969 19 9 28 67.9% 36 6 42 85.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1972 1 8 9 11.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 13 15 13.3%
26 1970 15 6 21 71.4% 16 3 19 84.2% 21 12 33 63.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 1973 0 4 4 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 6 7 13 46.2%
27 1971 12 7 19 63.2% 24 10 34 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 25 10 35 71.4% 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 7 14 50.0%
28 1972 22 10 32 68.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 35 15 50 70.0% 1975 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
29 1973 16 5 21 76.2% 39 8 47 83.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 32 8 40 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1974 14 5 19 73.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 6 2 8 75.0% 24 5 29 82.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1975 13 3 16 81.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1976 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 9 8 17 52.9% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 11 6 17 64.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 167 78 245 68.2% 199 73 272 73.2% 110 36 146 75.3% 192 91 283 67.8% — 38 39 77 49.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 27 20 47 57.4% 18 37 55 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tom Okker Robert Maud
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1700 120.9 — — — — +163 +11 -204 65.8% +0.93 6–4 (60%) — — +0.89
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1703 122.5 — — — — +258 +33 -167 66.3% +1.14 2–5 (29%) 1–0 — +2.57
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1696 132.5 — — — — +234 -52 -5 60.2% +0.90 5–4 (56%) — — +2.00
24 1968 1794 133.7 — — — — +101 +28 +106 72.8% +1.68 13–8 (62%) — — +1.39 1971 1670 137.5 — — — — +26 +7 +12 42.4% -0.42 5–11 (31%) 8–7 (53%) — -4.04
25 1969 2030 149.0 — — — — +67 +67 -72 73.5% +1.60 14–8 (64%) 2–0 — -4.53 1972 1588 132.9 — — — — -63 +83 — 23.6% -1.46 1–6 (14%) 0–9 (0%) — -3.96
26 1970 1947 145.1 — — — — -16 +206 +16 66.5% +1.16 8–11 (42%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.19 1973 1587 131.8 — — — — -7 +51 — 40.0% -0.72 4–7 (36%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.85
27 1971 2013 159.9 — — — — +69 +10 +75 65.3% +1.09 15–11 (58%) 15–22 (41%) — -6.81 1974 1641 124.4 — — — — -27 +18 +50 41.9% -0.73 8–3 (73%) 7–1 (88%) — +0.16
28 1972 2043 156.9 — — — — +57 -30 -5 63.5% +1.01 22–10 (69%) 24–19 (56%) — -5.06 1975 1604 119.3 — — — — -74 +56 — 27.6% -1.69 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -1.13
29 1973 2171 158.0 — — — — +40 -10 -158 70.9% +1.31 23–7 (77%) 20–10 (67%) — -4.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1974 2074 157.5 — — — — +132 +65 -20 68.6% +0.99 20–3 (87%) 22–8 (73%) — -4.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1975 2076 152.1 — — — — +76 -53 +48 70.1% +1.53 9–4 (69%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1976 1963 149.2 — — — — +53 -21 +146 61.5% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 1936 150.8 — — — — +16 — +174 52.1% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — -2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 1882 150.6 — — — — -30 -29 +247 51.9% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -4.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 1774 131.3 — — — — +9 -16 +387 51.0% +0.03 8–5 (62%) 8–8 (50%) — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 1717 136.0 — — — — +27 -8 +440 47.5% -0.25 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 1653 106.8 — — — — +39 — — 26.7% -1.20 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2196 154.7 — — — — +57 +28 +63 65.9% +1.08 155–88 (64%) 120–88 (58%) 102.9 -3.45 — 1766 134.9 — — — — +46 +23 -46 49.5% 0.00 32–44 (42%) 25–20 (56%) 102.5 -1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.