H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tom Okker vs Roy Barth H2H: 3-1
Tom Okker holds a 3–1 lead over Roy Barth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1972 Vancouver Wct third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1972* | Vancouver Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-3 6-1 | Roy Barth | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1972* | Macon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-4 6-3 | Roy Barth | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1969* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roy Barth | 6-4 6-1 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1968* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tom Okker | 3-6 6-0 2-6 6-3 6-0 | Roy Barth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tom Okker | Roy Barth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–11 | 59.3% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 6–29 | 17.1% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 | 1972 | 1–26 | 3.7% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 | 1973 | 4–21 | 16.0% | #126 | 1,370 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 | 1974 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #136 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |