H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tomas Behrend vs Cedric Kauffmann

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tomas Behrend vs Cedric Kauffmann.

GER Age 51 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Behrend #130 7-5 6-3 Cedric Kauffmann #239 Match data Jan 14, 2002 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Behrend #1,008 #74 515 1,676 41 72 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedric Kauffmann #1,270 #195 191 1,588 0 3 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Behrend Cedric Kauffmann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1997 1–1 50.0% #281 1,513 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #333 1,491 0 0
24 1999 1–1 50.0% #119 1,522 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #273 1,519 0 0
25 2000 7–11 38.9% #142 1,524 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #236 1,541 0 0
26 2001 5–8 38.5% #129 1,610 0 0
27 2002 0–2 0.0% #155 1,636 0 0
28 2003 11–13 45.8% #87 1,606 0 0
29 2004 5–10 33.3% #139 1,532 0 0
30 2005 7–14 33.3% #89 1,574 0 0
31 2006 4–12 25.0% #204 1,456 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Behrend Cedric Kauffmann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1997 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7%
30 2005 0 4 4 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 11 24 35 31.4% 27 42 69 39.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 109/113 of Tomas Behrend's and 2/2 of Cedric Kauffmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Behrend Cedric Kauffmann
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1997 2/2 3.5 2.0 54.4% 75.8% 51.8% 28.6% 75.0% 64.7% 43.6% —/—
23 —/— 1999 1/1 5.0 3.0 63.8% 64.9% 57.1% 62.5% 62.1% 18.2%
24 1999 2/2 5.0 3.0 58.3% 73.0% 60.3% 66.7% 75.0% 67.1% 46.9% —/—
25 2000 17/18 3.1 4.1 59.9% 66.8% 47.4% 55.1% 40.4% 58.9% 40.0% 2001 1/1 6.0 3.0 65.8% 67.7% 54.0% 53.8% 30.8% 63.0% 32.4%
26 2001 10/13 2.4 4.9 59.0% 66.2% 49.9% 64.6% 41.0% 59.4% 43.9% —/—
27 2002 2/2 4.5 10.0 48.9% 65.3% 41.2% 41.7% 39.7% 53.1% 40.5% —/—
28 2003 24/24 5.2 3.4 63.5% 69.3% 49.3% 58.4% 33.8% 61.8% 33.1% —/—
29 2004 15/15 3.4 2.7 63.9% 68.5% 45.3% 60.4% 46.5% 60.0% 36.0% —/—
30 2005 21/21 4.2 3.3 60.7% 66.4% 44.8% 56.0% 35.9% 57.8% 33.3% —/—
31 2006 16/16 3.6 4.1 57.2% 66.1% 38.4% 45.6% 41.5% 54.6% 35.4% —/—
Career 109/113 3.9 3.7 60.6% 67.6% 46.1% 55.7% 40.4% 59.1% 36.5% 2/3 5.5 3.0 64.8% 66.3% 55.6% 58.2% 15.4% 62.5% 25.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Behrend Cedric Kauffmann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1997 1514 111.0 +1.61 -1.15 1.237 54.3% 50.0% +1.25 0–1 -0.06
23 1999 1491 99.8 -6.00 +5.36 0.479 43.1% 0.0% -2.50 -0.01
24 1999 1523 112.3 +1.90 +0.07 1.426 57.4% 60.0% +1.20 0–1 +0.03 2000 1520 101.4 25.0% -1.25 +0.07
25 2000 1525 113.6 -2.41 +0.56 0.973 49.4% +13 +21 40.4% -0.45 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) +1.17 2001 1541 110.0 -1.36 +4.84 0.877 47.6% 40.0% -0.80 0–1 -0.24
26 2001 1611 124.0 -1.00 +2.40 1.082 51.4% -37 +15 40.6% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) -0.43 2002 1529 99.2
27 2002 1636 112.6 -0.96 +1.05 0.863 46.6% 25.0% -1.75 0–1 1–0 -0.36
28 2003 1607 117.9 -0.87 -3.14 0.867 47.7% -15 +27 42.4% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 6–5 (55%) +0.34
29 2004 1533 112.2 -1.44 -1.11 0.900 48.4% +39 35.3% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.65
30 2005 1574 122.5 -3.27 -2.47 0.791 45.9% -48 +94 32.1% -1.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) -0.90
31 2006 1456 100.7 -5.32 -3.59 0.781 45.4% +26 +106 30.6% -1.36 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) +1.40
32 2007 1459 98.6
Career 1676 120.6 -2.22 -1.54 0.892 48.0% -11 +52 37.4% -0.77 16–17 (48%) 16–18 (47%) 102.9 +1.63 1588 105.6 -3.68 +5.10 0.676 45.4% 27.3% -1.27 0–1 -6.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.