H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Filippo Volandri H2H: 4-2

Tomas Berdych holds a 4–2 lead over Filippo Volandri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Filippo Volandri
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-2 6-1 Filippo Volandri #81 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #14 6-1 6-3 Filippo Volandri #41 Match data
May 12, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Filippo Volandri #53 6-2 6-3 Tomas Berdych #12 Match data
Jun 2, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Tomas Berdych #20 6-3 6-1 6-1 Filippo Volandri #55 Match data
Oct 3, 2004* Palermo ATP 250 F Clay Tomas Berdych #55 6-3 6-3 Filippo Volandri #45 Match data
May 20, 2004* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Filippo Volandri #61 6-3 6-1 Tomas Berdych #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Filippo Volandri #1,074 #25 1,140 1,840 167 215 43.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Filippo Volandri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2001 0–2 0.0% #213 1,474 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2002 0–2 0.0% #153 1,448 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2003 18–16 52.9% #47 1,637 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2004 29–21 58.0% #43 1,723 0 1
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2005 27–27 50.0% #38 1,682 0 1
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2006 30–24 55.6% #38 1,711 0 2
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2007 20–25 44.4% #40 1,682 0 2
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2008 10–20 33.3% #102 1,529 0 2
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2009 0–3 0.0% #215 1,562 0 2
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2010 3–6 33.3% #91 1,610 0 2
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2011 13–19 40.6% #69 1,666 0 2
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2012 11–21 34.4% #88 1,609 0 2
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2013 5–11 31.2% #71 1,604 0 2
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2014 1–16 5.9% #212 1,477 0 2
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — 2016 0–2 0.0% #267 1,548 0 2