H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Gilles Simon H2H: 7-7

Tomas Berdych and Gilles Simon are tied 7–7 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 6–5 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2019 ABN AMRO Open first round 7-6(8) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
7 – 7
14 main draw meetings
Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Berdych #59 7-6(8) 6-4 Gilles Simon #31 Match data Feb 14, 2019* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Tomas Berdych #14 6-4 6-0 Gilles Simon #32 Match data May 27, 2017* QF Open 13 Provence ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Berdych #11 6-4 6-3 Gilles Simon #23 Match data Nov 4, 2016* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #5 6-3 6-3 Gilles Simon #14 Match data Oct 16, 2015* R16 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Gilles Simon #13 6-3 6-3 6-2 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data Jul 7, 2015* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-1 Gilles Simon #19 Match data Feb 14, 2015* SF ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Gilles Simon #29 7-6(4) 4-6 6-0 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data Oct 11, 2014* QF Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #6 6-7(5) 6-2 7-5 Gilles Simon #14 Match data Sep 28, 2013* SF Bangkok ATP 250 Hard
Gilles Simon #20 6-4 6-4 Tomas Berdych #6 Match data Nov 3, 2012* QF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Gilles Simon #12 6-4 4-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #19 Match data Nov 6, 2009* R16 Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Gilles Simon #10 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #20 Match data Oct 16, 2009* R16 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Tomas Berdych #14 7-6(3) 6-2 Gilles Simon #30 Match data Jan 11, 2008* R16 Sydney International International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gilles Simon #69 7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-4 Tomas Berdych #24 Match data Apr 20, 2006* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Gilles Simon #123 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-2 Tomas Berdych #23 Match data Jan 20, 2006* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,092 499 383 56.6% 0 0 0 1 13 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Gilles Simon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0
22 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5 2008 52–27 65.8% #7 1,983 0 5
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,939 0 6
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,928 0 7
26 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,906 0 9
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8 2012 43–24 64.2% #16 1,950 0 10
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,925 0 11
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,946 0 11
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,989 0 12
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13 2016 32–26 55.2% #25 1,945 0 12
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,767 0 12
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,869 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,776 0 14
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,755 0 14
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–17 22.7% #122 1,624 0 14
37 — — — — — — — 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,703 0 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Berdych Gilles Simon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2006 7 9 16 43.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 14 11 25 56.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 32 18 50 64.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2009 34 15 49 69.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
25 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2010 17 13 30 56.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2012 22 12 34 64.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 23 14 37 62.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2015 25 15 40 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
31 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
33 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 19 13 32 59.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — 297 224 521 57.0% 146 112 258 56.6% 52 42 94 55.3% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's and 866/882 of Gilles Simon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Berdych Gilles Simon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2% 2004 1/1 5.0 1.0 69.7% 64.5% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 61.8% 38.0%
20 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9% 2005 12/12 3.5 1.8 54.6% 66.1% 51.5% 51.7% 45.2% 59.6% 38.6%
21 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7% 2006 48/48 4.0 1.6 54.9% 67.0% 50.5% 50.9% 41.9% 59.4% 39.0%
22 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5% 2007 61/61 3.7 1.8 56.8% 66.3% 49.4% 57.1% 50.7% 59.1% 40.4%
23 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5% 2008 75/79 4.5 2.1 57.5% 69.6% 53.7% 57.5% 39.4% 62.8% 39.4%
24 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2% 2009 69/69 6.1 2.1 55.0% 74.4% 54.7% 66.1% 46.9% 65.6% 39.4%
25 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5% 2010 38/39 6.1 2.5 55.7% 75.1% 53.0% 61.3% 36.9% 65.4% 36.8%
26 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5% 2011 63/63 4.7 2.5 56.0% 69.4% 50.9% 52.0% 46.6% 61.3% 40.9%
27 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0% 2012 63/67 4.0 2.0 55.9% 69.9% 52.9% 57.5% 41.4% 62.3% 40.5%
28 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1% 2013 58/58 4.1 2.5 56.8% 69.0% 49.7% 59.2% 41.8% 60.6% 39.1%
29 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9% 2014 52/53 5.8 2.5 55.8% 71.4% 50.8% 63.3% 43.7% 62.7% 40.0%
30 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6% 2015 63/63 3.6 2.4 58.3% 68.7% 52.6% 53.5% 50.8% 62.1% 40.9%
31 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1% 2016 55/58 3.3 2.6 57.9% 67.1% 52.5% 57.3% 45.0% 60.7% 40.1%
32 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0% 2017 40/40 2.9 2.6 55.0% 67.7% 51.1% 55.2% 44.6% 60.4% 37.9%
33 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8% 2018 56/57 4.4 2.2 60.5% 70.8% 50.8% 56.2% 44.5% 62.9% 41.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 54/55 3.9 2.6 62.1% 68.3% 49.8% 61.7% 42.1% 61.6% 39.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 4.4 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 50.2% 53.1% 48.8% 61.8% 40.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 21/22 2.3 4.2 60.6% 66.3% 44.6% 45.0% 48.5% 57.5% 34.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 15/15 2.9 2.2 61.4% 65.3% 48.5% 54.8% 40.7% 58.5% 36.5%
Career — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6% — 866/882 4.3 2.3 57.2% 69.4% 51.4% 57.2% 44.5% 61.8% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Berdych Gilles Simon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) 101.3 -2.61 2004 1460 98.1 -0.26 -0.85 0.994 50.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
20 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) 104.1 -0.19 2005 1540 122.5 -2.20 +0.53 0.954 48.7% -20 +36 — 42.4% -0.36 6–1 (86%) 0–4 (0%) 106.2 +0.22
21 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) 105.6 +1.36 2006 1633 131.6 -2.73 +1.62 0.960 49.1% -36 +38 -42 46.2% -0.23 12–4 (75%) 5–9 (36%) 108.4 -0.30
22 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.8 -0.54 2007 1784 140.3 -2.50 +3.16 0.988 50.0% -97 +67 -200 50.7% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 111.1 -1.35
23 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) 101.9 +1.55 2008 1984 156.8 +0.08 +3.37 1.060 51.1% -7 -90 -295 59.8% +0.54 21–9 (70%) 17–9 (65%) 113.7 +0.42
24 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) 92.8 +0.74 2009 1940 155.0 +1.89 +2.48 1.145 52.4% +57 -140 -158 62.4% +0.88 13–10 (57%) 16–10 (62%) 102.3 +4.99
25 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) 104.7 +2.97 2010 1928 152.1 +2.01 +0.87 1.063 50.8% +47 -166 -126 50.0% +0.16 11–3 (79%) 6–7 (46%) 103.4 -0.07
26 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) 103.2 -0.55 2011 1907 159.5 -0.73 +3.87 1.055 51.0% -11 +50 -96 58.9% +0.64 12–12 (50%) 11–15 (42%) 95.5 +0.18
27 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) 92.8 +0.42 2012 1950 157.5 -0.02 +3.35 1.075 51.2% +13 +23 -123 59.0% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 95.5 +3.21
28 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) 88.5 +3.87 2013 1925 156.5 -2.02 +2.35 0.991 50.1% +20 +80 -82 57.2% +0.14 11–6 (65%) 16–8 (67%) 107.6 +1.94
29 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) 106.0 +2.13 2014 1947 160.4 -0.47 +3.65 1.071 51.4% +27 -53 -64 51.9% +0.42 9–9 (50%) 9–12 (43%) 98.9 +1.84
30 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) 101.8 -0.93 2015 1990 161.4 -1.32 +4.77 1.080 51.5% -18 -44 +40 60.4% +0.66 15–8 (65%) 12–13 (48%) 100.8 +1.25
31 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) 94.9 -1.68 2016 1945 160.5 -1.63 +3.73 1.020 50.5% +22 -37 +11 53.5% +0.21 13–10 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 103.4 +1.19
32 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 -1.07 2017 1767 147.6 -2.41 +2.04 0.958 49.2% +68 +9 +71 41.3% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 94.8 -1.50
33 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 99.1 -0.94 2018 1870 151.0 -0.74 +4.77 1.113 51.8% -5 -66 -8 59.4% +0.68 6–8 (43%) 21–16 (57%) 99.3 +0.92
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1777 145.4 -2.46 +2.32 1.015 49.9% +15 -28 +102 50.4% +0.06 12–7 (63%) 10–15 (40%) 99.2 +2.17
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1756 144.5 -1.00 +2.76 1.058 50.9% +43 — — 48.2% +0.12 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.4 -1.39
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1625 120.8 -3.59 -1.65 0.820 46.4% +88 -27 +101 30.4% -1.23 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 90.0 -1.48
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1704 125.3 -2.58 +1.62 0.879 47.7% +12 -42 — 44.4% -0.72 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) 109.4 -0.44
Career — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51 — 2092 157.4 -1.00 +2.94 1.034 50.6% +11 -7 -45 54.1% +0.28 181–120 (60%) 168–170 (50%) 105.5 +1.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.