H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 5-1

Tomas Berdych holds a 5–1 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tomas Berdych leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 7-6(8) 1-6 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jeremy Chardy #86 7-6(5) 7-6(8) 1-6 5-7 6-2 Tomas Berdych #20 Match data
Jul 5, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tomas Berdych #15 6-3 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #71 Match data
Jul 1, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tomas Berdych #6 6-2 6-7(8) 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #38 Match data
Feb 25, 2015* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #8 7-6(2) 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #34 Match data
Feb 23, 2011* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 6-2 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #51 Match data
May 9, 2009* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Tomas Berdych #28 6-1 5-7 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1