H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 5-2

Tomas Berdych holds a 5–2 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 5–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2015 US Open second round 7-6(2) 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 7-6(2) 6-1 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #132 Match data
Jan 22, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #7 7-6(0) 6-2 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #108 Match data
Jan 20, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-3 6-2 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #29 Match data
Oct 6, 2011* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #10 7-5 7-5 Jurgen Melzer #21 Match data
Jan 13, 2007* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Jurgen Melzer #40 6-2 6-4 Tomas Berdych #13 Match data
Aug 10, 2005* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #33 6-1 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #37 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #39 6-4 4-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5