H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 4-2

Tomas Berdych holds a 4–2 lead over Mischa Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2018 Rotterdam third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Mischa Zverev
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 15, 2018* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #17 7-5 6-3 Mischa Zverev #53 Match data
May 16, 2017* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tomas Berdych #13 7-6(7) 6-4 Mischa Zverev #32 Match data
Mar 10, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tomas Berdych #6 6-2 6-4 Mischa Zverev #144 Match data
Jun 12, 2009* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Mischa Zverev #45 3-6 6-2 7-6(8) Tomas Berdych #21 Match data
Apr 29, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mischa Zverev #76 4-6 6-2 7-5 Tomas Berdych #26 Match data
Sep 28, 2007* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #10 6-1 6-4 Mischa Zverev #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Mischa Zverev #1,373 #25 1,664 2,007 134 199 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Mischa Zverev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1 2006 3–3 50.0% #151 1,528 0 0
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2007 6–8 42.9% #88 1,606 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2008 18–23 43.9% #80 1,703 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2009 15–24 38.5% #78 1,630 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4 2010 14–18 43.8% #82 1,689 0 0
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2011 2–18 10.0% #211 1,498 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2012 0–3 0.0% #159 1,608 0 0
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2013 4–5 44.4% #176 1,639 0 0
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2015 7–8 46.7% #171 1,839 0 0
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2016 12–14 46.2% #51 1,917 0 0
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2017 30–31 49.2% #33 1,850 0 0
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2018 19–29 39.6% #69 1,686 0 1
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13 2019 3–12 20.0% #281 1,571 0 1
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13 2020 1–2 33.3% #264 1,568 0 1
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13 2021 0–1 0.0% #346 1,521 0 1