H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Tomas Berdych vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-1
Tomas Berdych and Pablo Cuevas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on clay, while Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2016 Roland Garros third round 4-6 6-3 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 4-6 6-3 6-2 7-5 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2015* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Berdych | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |