H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tomas Berdych vs Philipp Petzschner H2H: 3-2

Tomas Berdych holds a 3–2 lead over Philipp Petzschner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Philipp Petzschner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Petzschner won the 2011 Halle semifinal 7-6(7) 2-6 6-3.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 2011* Halle ATP 500 SF Grass Philipp Petzschner #71 7-6(7) 2-6 6-3 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data
Feb 25, 2011* Dubai ATP 500 QF Hard Tomas Berdych #7 7-5 6-4 Philipp Petzschner #73 Match data
May 8, 2010* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Philipp Petzschner #45 1-6 6-3 6-4 Tomas Berdych #16 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tomas Berdych #18 7-6(8) 6-7(7) 6-4 Philipp Petzschner #39 Match data
Aug 7, 2009* Washington ATP 500 R16 Hard Tomas Berdych #18 4-6 6-3 6-3 Philipp Petzschner #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,232 594 321 64.9% 0 1 0 4 8 13
Philipp Petzschner #1,212 #35 1,232 1,847 85 104 45.0% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Berdych Philipp Petzschner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2004 12–13 48.0% #45 1,657 0 1
19 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,866 0 2 2003 2–3 40.0% #367 1,517 0 0
20 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2 2004 1–1 50.0% #399 1,526 0 0
21 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,913 0 3 2005 0–2 0.0% #301 1,504 0 0
22 2008 30–18 62.5% #20 1,919 0 4
23 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,885 0 5 2007 1–1 50.0% #185 1,561 0 0
24 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,919 0 5 2008 10–9 52.6% #66 1,735 0 1
25 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,080 0 6 2009 15–25 37.5% #80 1,695 0 1
26 2012 52–20 72.2% #6 2,157 0 8 2010 21–19 52.5% #57 1,760 0 1
27 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,084 0 8 2011 21–22 48.8% #63 1,763 0 1
28 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,082 0 10 2012 10–15 40.0% #115 1,693 0 1
29 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,109 0 12 2013 3–5 37.5% #206 1,662 0 1
30 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13 2014 1–2 33.3% #421 1,658 0 1
31 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,027 0 13
32 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,909 0 13
33 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,869 0 13