H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Miloslav Mecir H2H: 0-1
Miloslav Mecir holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miloslav Mecir leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miloslav Mecir won the 1990 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Miloslav Mecir | 6-4 6-4 6-1 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Miloslav Mecir | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |