H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Carbonell vs Nuno Marques H2H: 1-1
Tomas Carbonell and Nuno Marques are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1996 Oporto third round 7-5 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POR
Age 56
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1996* | Oporto | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Nuno Marques | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1995* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nuno Marques | 6-3 6-1 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nuno Marques | #853 | #86 | 514 | 1,535 | 35 | 84 | 29.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Carbonell | Nuno Marques | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #158 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #151 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #281 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #90 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #349 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #706 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |