H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Tomas Carbonell vs Stefano Pescosolido H2H: 3-0

Tomas Carbonell holds a 3–0 lead over Stefano Pescosolido in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Carbonell leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1995 Montpellier Open round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Stefano Pescosolido
ITA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Carbonell #73 3-6 6-4 6-2 Stefano Pescosolido #64 Match data Oct 19, 1995* R32 Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Carbonell #67 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-0 Stefano Pescosolido #49 Match data Jun 9, 1994* R32 Florence ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Carbonell #65 6-4 6-4 Stefano Pescosolido #63 Match data Apr 28, 1994* R32 Madrid ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Stefano Pescosolido #1,500 #42 781 1,764 107 156 40.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Carbonell Stefano Pescosolido
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #739 1,491 0 0
18 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #225 1,482 0 0
19 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0 1990 4–11 26.7% #141 1,479 0 0
20 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0 1991 10–16 38.5% #65 1,538 0 0
21 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0 1992 21–26 44.7% #62 1,591 0 1
22 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0 1993 14–14 50.0% #59 1,734 0 2
23 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1 1994 17–25 40.5% #113 1,622 0 2
24 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1 1995 20–17 54.1% #68 1,703 0 2
25 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1 1996 13–25 34.2% #136 1,583 0 2
26 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1 1997 0–2 0.0% #228 1,559 0 2
27 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2 1998 3–6 33.3% #183 1,567 0 2
28 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2 1999 2–2 50.0% #193 1,583 0 2
29 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #130 1,459 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #233 1,466 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Carbonell Stefano Pescosolido
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 7 6 13 53.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 11 10 21 52.4% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 9 14 23 39.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 9 7 16 56.3% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1996 6 14 20 30.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8% — 53 62 115 46.1% 42 62 104 40.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 7 22 29 24.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's and 215/240 of Stefano Pescosolido's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Carbonell Stefano Pescosolido
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 24/26 4.3 3.6 56.0% 69.3% 49.7% 52.5% 47.6% 60.4% 38.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 41/47 4.4 5.0 50.8% 72.3% 49.0% 51.6% 39.2% 60.7% 36.7%
22 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2% 1993 26/28 3.7 4.5 51.3% 70.6% 48.4% 50.3% 44.1% 59.6% 37.3%
23 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3% 1994 38/42 4.4 3.9 50.1% 68.8% 49.1% 53.1% 43.1% 59.1% 37.3%
24 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4% 1995 31/37 5.1 3.9 51.9% 71.9% 50.6% 52.7% 40.3% 61.9% 38.7%
25 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8% 1996 35/38 4.3 5.4 51.6% 71.4% 43.2% 58.5% 42.3% 57.6% 37.1%
26 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6% 1997 2/2 2.0 3.0 55.4% 67.5% 48.4% 35.7% 33.3% 58.9% 31.7%
27 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4% 1998 7/9 4.7 4.3 53.8% 72.1% 42.8% 41.4% 30.3% 58.8% 34.9%
28 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0% 1999 4/4 6.0 5.8 50.7% 80.2% 53.3% 55.8% 29.6% 67.0% 32.1%
29 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 2/2 4.5 5.5 54.6% 70.4% 47.2% 31.8% 37.5% 60.1% 31.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/5 3.0 5.8 56.4% 68.2% 42.2% 46.6% 43.9% 56.7% 34.0%
Career — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3% — 215/263 4.4 4.5 51.9% 70.9% 48.0% 52.4% 41.7% 59.8% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Carbonell Stefano Pescosolido
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40 1988 1492 102.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
18 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21 1989 1483 106.8 — — — — — +16 — 25.0% -0.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.41
19 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60 1990 1479 120.4 — — — — +57 +37 — 39.4% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +0.20
20 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 96.3 +0.46 1991 1539 124.9 -0.08 -0.54 0.969 49.6% +42 -22 — 44.6% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–9 (44%) 102.7 +0.91
21 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) 99.7 -0.63 1992 1592 142.9 -0.26 -1.33 0.934 48.8% +44 -35 — 43.5% -0.44 8–7 (53%) 9–13 (41%) 103.6 -1.93
22 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) 90.5 -2.85 1993 1734 137.5 -0.42 +0.57 0.923 48.5% -35 -98 — 50.0% -0.18 8–8 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.28
23 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) 110.9 +0.61 1994 1623 137.0 -1.47 -0.99 0.910 48.5% -3 +73 — 43.5% -0.43 6–9 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 97.8 -0.89
24 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 96.1 -1.48 1995 1704 132.6 +1.14 -0.02 1.015 50.5% -69 +87 — 52.8% +0.01 5–7 (42%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 +0.14
25 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +0.63 1996 1584 128.2 -2.47 -0.24 0.876 47.9% -35 +121 — 37.8% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 95.2 -0.69
26 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) 104.5 -0.06 1997 1560 104.5 -0.36 -2.55 0.772 45.2% — — — 0.0% -1.75 — 0–1 — +0.06
27 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 107.4 -0.23 1998 1567 114.7 -1.34 -0.60 0.845 46.5% -10 — -12 41.7% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.6 +0.09
28 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 97.4 +0.37 1999 1583 105.5 +0.95 -0.76 0.972 50.0% — — -14 55.6% 0.00 0–1 2–0 — +0.28
29 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.26 2000 1525 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25 2001 1476 91.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1468 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1459 106.4 -0.19 +0.76 0.784 45.3% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1466 105.1 -1.46 -0.16 0.785 45.2% — +76 — 21.4% -1.50 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.04
Career — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58 — 1765 135.1 -0.67 -0.52 0.924 48.7% -3 +37 -13 43.2% -0.44 40–48 (45%) 53–53 (50%) 103.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.