H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tomas Machac vs David Goffin H2H: 2-0
Tomas Machac holds a 2–0 lead over David Goffin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Machac leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Machac won the 2024 US Open third round 6-3 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tomas Machac | 6-3 6-1 6-2 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tomas Machac | 3-6 3-6 6-4 6-1 7-6(5) | David Goffin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Machac | David Goffin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |