H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tomas Machac vs Jack Sock H2H: 1-0
Tomas Machac holds a 1–0 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Machac leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Machac won the 2023 Houston third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 25
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2023* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Machac | 6-2 6-4 | Jack Sock | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | #53 | #20 | 2,330 | 1,989 | 75 | 63 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Machac | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2024 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #25 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2026 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |