H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tomas Smid vs John Newcombe H2H: 0-1
John Newcombe holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Newcombe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Newcombe won the 1976 Rome fourth round 6-3 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 82
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1976* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | John Newcombe | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| John Newcombe | #826 | #1 | 0 | 2,201 | 556 | 224 | 71.3% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | John Newcombe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 70–37 | 65.4% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 1,887 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 65–23 | 73.9% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,082 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,129 | 2 | 27 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,052 | 4 | 31 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 87–16 | 84.5% | #2 | 2,115 | 4 | 40 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #20 | 2,004 | 5 | 41 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #21 | 1,827 | 5 | 41 |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #119 | 1,833 | 5 | 41 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #24 | 1,815 | 5 | 41 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #226 | 1,831 | 5 | 41 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,799 | 5 | 41 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,792 | 5 | 41 |