H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tomas Zib vs Adrian Cruciat

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tomas Zib vs Adrian Cruciat.

CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
ROU Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #201 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Adrian Cruciat #155 Match data May 26, 2008* Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adrian Cruciat #1,701 #148 479 1,510 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Zib Adrian Cruciat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #178 1,485 0 0
27 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Zib Adrian Cruciat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 123/134 of Tomas Zib's and 3/3 of Adrian Cruciat's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Zib Adrian Cruciat
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5% —/—
24 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4% —/—
25 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8% 2008 3/3 4.0 1.0 62.0% 70.0% 42.0% 65.3% 21.0% 59.5% 32.5%
27 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5% —/—
28 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6% —/—
29 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9% —/—
30 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1% —/—
31 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8% —/—
32 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3% —/—
Career 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0% 3/3 4.0 1.0 62.0% 70.0% 42.0% 65.3% 21.0% 59.5% 32.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Zib Adrian Cruciat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1998 1488 +0.05
23 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 99.1 +0.15
24 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.93 2007 1484 97.8
25 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) +0.84 2008 1485 95.1 -0.66 -2.61 0.803 46.0% +25 0.0% -3.25 +0.30
26 2002 1446 99.2 2009 1465 99.0
27 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 21.4% -2.14 2–1 (67%) -0.14 2010 1449 96.5
28 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 -0.23 2011 1461 104.0
29 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) 100.8 +0.40
30 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 93.7 -0.86
31 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) -0.21
32 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 +0.06
33 2009 1544 102.6
Career 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73 1511 97.2 -0.66 -2.61 0.803 46.0% +25 0.0% -3.25 +10.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.