H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tomas Zib vs Kevin Kim H2H: 3-0
Tomas Zib holds a 3–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Zib leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2007 Washington second round 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2007* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2005* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Tomas Zib | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2005* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 6-3 7-5 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |