H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Alex Corretja H2H: 4-1

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2000 Vienna Open round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Alex Corretja
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #28 6-1 6-0 Alex Corretja #9 Match data Oct 12, 2000* R32 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #48 7-6(7) 6-3 Alex Corretja #9 Match data Sep 25, 2000* R16 Sydney Olympics Olympics Hard
Tommy Haas #16 6-4 6-4 Alex Corretja #14 Match data Jul 24, 1999* SF Stuttgart Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Tommy Haas #38 7-6(2) 2-6 6-3 Alex Corretja #6 Match data Nov 5, 1998* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Alex Corretja #7 2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 Tommy Haas #53 Match data Oct 25, 1998* F Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 1,998 417 278 60.0% 0 2 1 5 9 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Alex Corretja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,849 0 1
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,727 0 1
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,840 0 4
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9
25 — — — — — — — 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2000 52–19 73.2% #8 1,933 0 14
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,649 0 17
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Alex Corretja
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 24 20 44 54.5% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1994 4 3 7 57.1% 39 18 57 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 1 7 8 12.5% 24 19 43 55.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 24 8 32 75.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 13 10 23 56.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 27 12 39 69.2% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2003 7 10 17 41.2% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 6 9 15 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 133 104 237 56.1% 271 144 415 65.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 23 33 30.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 600/695 of Alex Corretja's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Alex Corretja
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 1992 23/24 1.6 1.0 57.2% 62.8% 47.6% 54.5% 52.6% 56.3% 42.3%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 1993 42/47 2.0 1.5 56.1% 66.8% 51.5% 60.5% 47.8% 59.6% 40.3%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 1994 61/66 2.1 1.7 65.4% 66.6% 51.5% 56.3% 43.8% 60.9% 42.6%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1995 48/52 1.9 1.2 67.8% 63.4% 49.9% 56.6% 46.5% 59.1% 41.0%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1996 54/63 3.6 2.4 59.4% 69.1% 52.1% 53.2% 46.2% 62.0% 40.2%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1997 63/72 3.4 2.6 57.4% 72.3% 53.8% 59.2% 53.3% 64.2% 44.3%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1998 59/73 4.8 2.3 55.7% 71.9% 52.5% 58.9% 43.5% 63.3% 41.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 42/55 4.7 2.3 54.1% 71.2% 54.2% 58.2% 41.2% 63.2% 38.7%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2000 55/71 5.5 2.3 49.3% 76.1% 54.7% 62.1% 46.8% 65.4% 41.5%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2001 47/50 5.2 3.7 48.2% 70.7% 52.7% 57.3% 42.9% 61.2% 38.8%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2002 38/52 4.5 3.1 57.6% 71.7% 55.1% 59.4% 45.5% 64.6% 42.6%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2003 31/33 4.3 3.0 56.3% 68.0% 48.8% 56.4% 35.8% 59.8% 36.6%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2004 31/31 3.7 3.3 57.9% 68.2% 50.4% 62.4% 41.7% 60.7% 36.9%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2005 6/6 1.3 2.7 60.0% 58.1% 44.6% 55.1% 24.5% 54.5% 36.1%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 600/695 3.7 2.3 57.3% 69.5% 52.2% 58.1% 45.2% 61.9% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Alex Corretja
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 1992 1567 127.1 -2.60 +0.75 0.968 49.4% +6 +8 — 46.6% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.54
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1993 1658 141.2 -0.53 +1.13 0.997 50.2% -123 +64 — 50.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 1994 1849 150.0 +0.83 +3.51 1.089 51.6% -259 +60 — 58.1% +0.50 23–10 (70%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.60
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1995 1727 136.5 -1.41 +2.29 1.002 50.0% -169 +65 — 52.4% +0.15 6–11 (35%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 1996 1784 149.2 +0.51 +2.14 1.060 50.8% -86 +90 -150 55.3% +0.47 10–4 (71%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.11
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1997 1840 154.1 +2.24 +5.27 1.237 54.3% -146 +167 — 65.9% +1.20 9–10 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.17
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1998 1963 157.7 +1.53 +2.59 1.122 52.2% -34 +97 — 63.7% +0.90 21–6 (78%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.17
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1771 145.8 +1.50 +0.88 1.054 51.0% +5 +184 — 55.6% +0.48 16–8 (67%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.15
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2000 1933 161.5 +3.18 +4.08 1.199 53.1% -19 +143 — 68.0% +1.14 13–6 (68%) 20–10 (67%) — -1.65
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2001 1781 141.6 -0.54 +1.48 1.001 50.1% -24 +247 — 57.9% +0.20 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -0.84
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2002 1851 149.1 +1.45 +3.39 1.201 53.3% -106 +256 — 66.2% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.91
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2003 1650 130.9 -1.00 -0.14 0.912 48.2% +41 +144 — 36.3% -0.62 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.20
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2004 1623 126.5 -2.17 -0.03 0.939 48.9% +17 +95 — 43.7% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.64
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2005 1572 105.8 -2.46 -1.57 0.794 45.4% — +73 — 9.1% -2.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.16
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1998 152.9 +0.52 +2.39 1.070 51.3% -50 +121 -150 57.3% +0.52 139–94 (60%) 128–125 (51%) 100.4 -0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.