H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 3-0

Tommy Haas holds a 3–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2004 Stockholm third round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Davide Sanguinetti
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 28, 2004* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #22 7-6(5) 6-4 Davide Sanguinetti #95 Match data
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tommy Haas #45 6-1 5-7 6-2 3-6 6-2 Davide Sanguinetti #102 Match data
Mar 14, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #22 6-3 1-6 7-5 Davide Sanguinetti #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,771 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,639 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,528 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,620 0 2
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,588 0 2
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,710 0 2
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —