H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Evgeny Donskoy H2H: 1-0

Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Memphis round of 32 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Evgeny Donskoy
RUS Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #18 7-6(6) 6-4 Evgeny Donskoy #75 Match data Feb 21, 2013* R32 Memphis ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Evgeny Donskoy #1,380 #65 764 1,793 52 113 31.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Evgeny Donskoy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #514 1,469 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #472 1,473 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2010 1–2 33.3% #259 1,513 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2011 0–2 0.0% #144 1,552 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2012 0–4 0.0% #81 1,482 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2013 12–19 38.7% #113 1,654 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2014 3–9 25.0% #130 1,546 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2015 5–5 50.0% #91 1,720 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2016 7–19 26.9% #125 1,653 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2017 5–14 26.3% #72 1,623 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2018 14–21 40.0% #97 1,641 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2019 3–6 33.3% #112 1,618 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2020 1–4 20.0% #123 1,540 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2021 1–6 14.3% #172 1,573 0 0
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Evgeny Donskoy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 4 11 15 26.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2018 10 15 25 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2021 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 42 78 120 35.0% 6 23 29 20.7% 4 12 16 25.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 162/165 of Evgeny Donskoy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Evgeny Donskoy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 2008 1/1 1.0 1.0 54.2% 61.5% 45.5% 33.3% — 54.2% 20.0%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2009 1/1 6.0 1.0 42.0% 81.0% 51.7% 57.1% 0.0% 64.0% 28.6%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2010 3/3 6.3 3.0 54.5% 67.1% 48.9% 65.2% 73.9% 58.9% 38.6%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2011 2/2 4.0 2.5 60.9% 72.9% 43.0% 31.3% 14.3% 60.3% 28.6%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2012 4/4 4.0 1.0 60.0% 64.9% 55.3% 52.5% 24.6% 61.1% 30.3%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2013 31/31 5.8 2.5 57.3% 72.2% 49.2% 63.9% 37.8% 62.4% 33.9%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2014 12/12 5.7 2.1 59.7% 70.7% 52.6% 57.9% 33.0% 63.3% 33.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 10/10 5.1 3.2 58.1% 73.3% 49.4% 61.9% 34.4% 63.4% 36.0%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2016 23/26 5.0 2.2 58.4% 67.7% 50.2% 55.6% 36.7% 60.5% 32.8%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2017 19/19 5.5 2.6 57.5% 71.6% 49.6% 54.2% 26.9% 62.5% 31.9%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2018 35/35 3.6 1.9 60.9% 66.0% 50.9% 62.7% 37.0% 60.3% 34.0%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2019 9/9 6.7 2.2 59.9% 73.9% 43.2% 60.5% 56.7% 61.6% 31.1%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2020 5/5 3.0 4.2 56.7% 68.8% 40.7% 48.5% 35.8% 56.7% 30.5%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2021 7/7 5.3 3.0 55.6% 70.7% 47.0% 53.3% 32.2% 60.2% 28.6%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 162/165 5.0 2.4 58.5% 69.8% 49.4% 58.7% 36.0% 61.3% 33.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Evgeny Donskoy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1483 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 2008 1469 105.0 -0.44 -0.12 0.436 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 2009 1474 100.3 -1.05 -1.78 0.794 45.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2010 1513 111.3 +0.09 -0.08 0.938 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.62 0–2 1–1 — +0.24
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2011 1552 116.9 -0.88 -2.23 0.722 45.6% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2012 1483 102.2 -1.07 -2.34 0.779 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.09
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2013 1654 136.6 -0.81 -1.65 0.902 48.2% +1 -165 -44 43.7% -0.49 4–7 (36%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.05
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2014 1546 122.5 -0.84 -1.27 0.914 48.1% +56 — — 37.5% -0.84 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.54
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1721 129.8 -0.73 +0.60 0.984 50.0% +8 — — 52.0% 0.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2016 1653 128.2 -1.90 -3.06 0.831 46.7% -12 -76 -87 35.8% -0.96 2–8 (20%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.44
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2017 1624 132.0 -0.67 -3.10 0.850 46.8% +89 -116 — 25.0% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.25
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2018 1642 136.4 -2.46 -2.27 0.857 47.6% -9 -50 -129 40.2% -0.85 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.64
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2019 1618 122.8 -1.17 -2.19 0.810 47.4% +6 — — 30.4% -0.65 1–0 2–4 (33%) — +0.32
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2020 1540 109.2 -2.48 -1.01 0.704 43.9% +38 — — 23.1% -2.16 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2021 1573 116.3 -1.71 -1.82 0.719 45.4% +29 — — 23.5% -0.94 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2022 1526 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2023 1470 92.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1794 130.1 -1.40 -1.99 0.853 47.4% +16 -96 -87 36.5% -0.89 12–35 (26%) 29–42 (41%) 90.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.