H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Filippo Volandri H2H: 1-0

Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Filippo Volandri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 6-3 0-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Filippo Volandri
ITA Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #112 6-3 0-6 6-4 6-4 Filippo Volandri #81 Match data May 29, 2012* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Filippo Volandri #1,074 #25 1,140 1,840 167 216 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Filippo Volandri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #213 1,474 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #153 1,448 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2003 18–16 52.9% #47 1,653 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2004 29–22 56.9% #43 1,723 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2005 27–27 50.0% #38 1,682 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2006 30–24 55.6% #38 1,711 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2007 20–25 44.4% #40 1,683 0 2
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2008 10–20 33.3% #102 1,530 0 2
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2009 0–3 0.0% #215 1,562 0 2
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2010 3–6 33.3% #91 1,610 0 2
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2011 13–19 40.6% #69 1,667 0 2
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2012 11–21 34.4% #88 1,611 0 2
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2013 5–11 31.2% #71 1,604 0 2
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2014 1–16 5.9% #212 1,477 0 2
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 2016 0–2 0.0% #267 1,548 0 2
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Filippo Volandri
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2002 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 2 5 7 28.6% 25 12 37 67.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 0 9 9 0.0% 26 15 41 63.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 26 14 40 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 11 13 15.4% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2009 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 12 14 26 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 0 6 6 0.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 4 4 0.0% 1 11 12 8.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 9 58 67 13.4% 154 137 291 52.9% 2 11 13 15.4% 2 10 12 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 381/383 of Filippo Volandri's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Filippo Volandri
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2001 2/2 1.5 2.5 66.4% 63.2% 46.8% 52.7% 51.4% 57.9% 35.3%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2002 2/2 0.0 3.5 61.7% 63.0% 46.4% 61.8% 44.3% 56.6% 36.8%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2003 33/34 0.7 3.0 66.9% 64.2% 48.6% 56.6% 51.4% 59.0% 42.9%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2004 50/51 1.1 2.7 67.4% 65.2% 48.2% 56.0% 56.5% 59.9% 43.8%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2005 54/54 1.0 2.8 65.9% 64.4% 50.6% 55.8% 45.3% 59.5% 41.9%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2006 54/54 0.6 1.9 69.0% 62.3% 51.4% 48.5% 38.2% 58.8% 41.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 45/45 0.8 2.1 67.6% 61.2% 49.1% 47.2% 52.1% 56.9% 40.9%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2008 30/30 0.6 2.5 69.5% 61.6% 47.9% 58.6% 40.9% 57.3% 39.0%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2009 3/3 0.3 2.7 79.9% 54.5% 44.0% 55.3% 31.7% 52.2% 41.4%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2010 9/9 0.2 2.8 70.4% 62.0% 52.5% 53.3% 46.2% 58.6% 42.0%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2011 32/32 0.4 2.9 66.6% 59.2% 48.1% 52.2% 43.7% 55.1% 41.0%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2012 32/32 0.4 1.8 71.4% 61.5% 47.1% 55.8% 44.3% 57.5% 38.5%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2013 16/16 0.5 1.8 70.2% 61.5% 51.1% 54.3% 47.6% 58.4% 41.3%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2014 17/17 0.9 2.1 68.4% 57.3% 43.2% 48.5% 34.8% 52.5% 33.8%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% 2016 2/2 0.0 0.5 76.4% 60.7% 51.5% 53.5% 26.7% 58.8% 34.2%
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 381/383 0.7 2.4 68.2% 62.3% 49.0% 53.3% 46.0% 57.9% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Filippo Volandri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 105.9 +0.37 2001 1474 108.2 +1.72 -1.09 0.838 47.1% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.04
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 107.9 -2.69 2002 1449 101.6 -1.26 -2.43 0.849 46.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 104.0 +0.33 2003 1654 136.6 -1.72 +4.29 1.048 51.2% -186 +118 — 51.3% +0.08 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 -0.64
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) 107.0 -0.61 2004 1723 147.1 -1.90 +5.15 1.094 52.0% -222 +152 -186 57.9% +0.75 8–8 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.17
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) 104.3 -1.10 2005 1682 144.8 -2.77 +3.62 1.034 50.8% -258 +185 — 53.2% +0.43 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) 93.6 +1.28
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) 108.9 +1.60 2006 1711 132.1 -2.89 +3.14 1.011 50.0% -294 +186 — 51.7% +0.04 10–3 (77%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 +2.50
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1684 143.2 -4.62 +3.98 0.948 48.9% -270 +155 — 43.9% -0.41 5–9 (36%) 4–8 (33%) 92.5 -2.15
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 103.2 -2.50 2008 1530 125.6 -3.85 +0.88 0.913 48.5% -156 +142 — 39.3% -0.51 1–3 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 93.9 +1.21
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) 97.9 +0.64 2009 1563 117.7 -3.00 -0.43 0.866 46.4% — +105 — 25.0% -1.63 0–2 1–1 — -0.01
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) 102.2 +0.81 2010 1611 123.5 -2.54 +1.48 1.013 50.2% — +80 — 42.9% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.37
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 100.3 +2.11 2011 1668 128.3 -5.76 +2.55 0.913 48.2% -313 +67 -200 37.1% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 1–6 (14%) 97.3 +0.32
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 97.2 -0.96 2012 1611 134.1 -4.09 +0.37 0.905 48.3% -283 +83 — 45.0% -0.34 5–13 (28%) 2–4 (33%) 92.6 +1.01
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) 105.4 -1.53 2013 1605 137.6 -3.48 +1.85 0.994 49.8% -286 +78 — 39.5% -0.39 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 94.9 +0.02
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2014 1477 108.9 -7.74 -1.96 0.712 43.4% -173 +48 — 8.1% -2.41 1–1 0–7 (0%) — +0.74
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) 96.4 +1.11 2015 1509 107.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 106.0 -1.93 2016 1549 113.1 +1.22 +0.09 0.829 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.01
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 104.9 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) 107.1 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 96.1 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1841 141.0 -3.44 +2.79 0.975 49.6% -248 +134 -193 45.8% -0.18 42–62 (40%) 33–60 (35%) 84.1 +1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.