H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-2

Jurgen Melzer holds a 2–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2005 Halle fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 2005* Halle ATP 250 R16 Grass Tommy Haas #23 6-2 3-6 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #37 Match data
Apr 23, 2005* Houston ATP 250 QF Clay Jurgen Melzer #40 2-6 6-2 6-4 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
Oct 11, 2002* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Jurgen Melzer #95 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —