H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 4-0

Tommy Haas holds a 4–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2004 Stockholm fourth round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 29, 2004* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #22 7-5 7-5 Kenneth Carlsen #79 Match data
Jul 16, 2004* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #91 6-2 6-0 Kenneth Carlsen #88 Match data
Jun 11, 2004* Halle ATP 250 R16 Grass Tommy Haas #112 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #104 Match data
Jul 18, 1997* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #79 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Kenneth Carlsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —